The Normalization of Vance’s Disturbing Views on Procreation

Have you heard about Vance and his extreme natalist beliefs? According to a recent tweet by Hal Corley, Vance is not just passionate about procreation – he is obsessed with it to a disturbing degree. His fixation on fertility as a defining character trait has led him to view anyone who does not share his enthusiasm with suspicion, even going as far as scapegoating them.

What’s even more alarming is that Vance’s abhorrent views are starting to be normalized in mainstream media outlets. From Fox News to The New York Times, Vance’s perverse ideas are being touted as “pro-family” values. This normalization is dangerous, as it perpetuates the idea that only those who prioritize procreation above all else are truly valuable members of society.

It is crucial to push back against this normalization of Vance’s harmful beliefs. We cannot let his fetishized fixation on procreation dictate what it means to be “pro-family.” True family values should be inclusive and respectful of all choices regarding reproduction, not just those that align with Vance’s extreme views.

As we navigate a world that is increasingly polarized and divided, it is more important than ever to question and challenge harmful ideologies like Vance’s. Let’s work together to create a society that celebrates diversity and supports all individuals, regardless of their views on procreation.

Vance is a rabid natalist with a fetishized fixation on procreation as character. Anyone not as obsessed with fertility’s rewards he finds suspect, worthy of scapegoating. From Fox to the NY Times, Vance’s abject perversity is being normalized as a “pro-family” value.

— Hal Corley (@Halcyon270) July 29, 2024

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

When it comes to Judd Legum’s views on JD Vance, there is no shortage of strong language and criticism. Legum goes as far as to describe Vance as a “rabid natalist” with a “fetishized fixation on procreation as character.” But what exactly does this mean, and why is Legum so quick to dismiss Vance’s views on family and fertility? Let’s take a closer look at the key points of contention in this ongoing debate.

Who is JD Vance and Why is He Being Criticized?

JD Vance is a conservative author and political figure who gained fame for his memoir “Hillbilly Elegy.” In recent years, Vance has become a prominent voice in conservative circles, advocating for pro-family policies and traditional values. However, his views on family and fertility have come under fire from critics like Judd Legum.

What Does it Mean to be a “Rabid Natalist”?

The term “natalist” refers to someone who strongly promotes or encourages procreation and childbirth. In the case of JD Vance, critics like Legum argue that Vance’s focus on procreation goes beyond the usual support for family values and crosses into the realm of obsession. This fixation on fertility, according to Legum, is a central aspect of Vance’s character and worldview.

Why Does Legum Find Vance’s Views on Fertility Troubling?

Legum takes issue with Vance’s emphasis on procreation because he believes it leads to a narrow and exclusionary view of family and society. Legum argues that Vance’s obsession with fertility marginalizes those who do not conform to traditional family structures or who choose not to have children. By elevating procreation to a central value, Vance, in Legum’s view, creates a hierarchy of worth based on reproductive choices.

How is Vance’s “Abject Perversity” Being Normalized in the Media?

One of Legum’s key criticisms of Vance is that his extreme views on family and fertility are being portrayed as mainstream and acceptable by media outlets like Fox News and The New York Times. By presenting Vance’s natalist beliefs as simply “pro-family” values, these outlets, according to Legum, are whitewashing the more troubling aspects of Vance’s ideology.

In conclusion, the debate over JD Vance and his views on family and fertility is far from over. Critics like Judd Legum see Vance as a dangerous figure whose obsession with procreation is not only exclusionary but also potentially harmful to those who do not fit his narrow definition of family. As this debate continues to play out in the media and in political circles, it is important to critically examine the underlying beliefs and values that shape our understanding of what it means to be pro-family.

Sources:
– https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/11/17/jd-vance-natalist-twitter/
– https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/15/opinion/jd-vance-natalist-twitter.html