Teen Accused of Murdering Tacoma Tourist Was Supposed to be Under Monitoring

In a shocking turn of events, a 16-year-old accused of murdering a Tacoma tourist in the Faubourg Marigny in January was supposed to be under monitoring ordered by the Orleans Parish Juvenile Court after previous offenses. Malik Cornelius, the accused killer, was supposed to be monitored from his cell phone by a company called Repath, but allegedly committed a murder anyway.

Cornelius is accused of fatally shooting Jacob Carter, a visiting bagel shop owner from Washington, on Jan. 5 near the intersection of Bourbon and Kerlerec streets. This tragic incident has raised concerns about the effectiveness of cell phone monitoring for juvenile offenders.

Critics argue that cell phone monitoring should only be used for low-level offenders, and the Orleans Parish Juvenile Court has since suspended that type of monitoring. Unsuspecting monitoring has been a chronic issue in juvenile court, with sometimes deadly consequences.

In response to these incidents, there are signs of permanent changes coming to the way released juvenile offenders are monitored, not just in New Orleans but across the state. Juvenile justice reform activists are advocating for more accountability in the system to help reform offenders and ultimately save lives.

Cornelius is being tried as an adult for the alleged second-degree murder of Carter, with a court hearing set for next month. Meanwhile, monitoring experts are working to set up a statewide network to react promptly when needed, ensuring that individuals follow court orders and stay out of trouble.

Overall, this tragic event has shed light on the need for better monitoring and accountability in the juvenile justice system to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.

Accused killer of Tacoma visitor in January also was under Orleans Juvenile Court monitoring order

When news broke that the accused killer of a Tacoma visitor in January was also under Orleans Juvenile Court monitoring order, many questions arose about how such a tragic event could have occurred. In this article, we will delve into the details of this case and explore the implications of the accused’s prior legal history.

### Who is the accused killer and what is the background of the case?
The accused killer in question is a young individual who was allegedly involved in the murder of a visitor in Tacoma in January. The victim, who was visiting the area at the time, tragically lost their life in what authorities have described as a senseless act of violence. The accused, who cannot be named due to legal reasons, has a history of involvement with the Orleans Juvenile Court.

### What was the Orleans Juvenile Court monitoring order?
The Orleans Juvenile Court monitoring order refers to a legal mandate that was put in place to oversee the accused’s behavior and ensure compliance with the court’s directives. This monitoring order is typically implemented for individuals who have been involved in legal trouble in the past or who may be at risk of engaging in criminal activities.

### How did the accused killer’s prior legal history come to light?
The accused killer’s prior legal history came to light during the investigation into the Tacoma visitor’s murder. Authorities discovered that the accused had been under the Orleans Juvenile Court monitoring order at the time of the incident, raising questions about the effectiveness of such oversight measures.

### What are the implications of the accused killer’s prior legal history?
The implications of the accused killer’s prior legal history are significant, as they shed light on the potential shortcomings of the juvenile justice system. The fact that the accused was able to commit such a heinous crime while under court monitoring raises concerns about the effectiveness of the current system in place to rehabilitate young offenders.

### How can similar incidents be prevented in the future?
In order to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future, it is essential to reassess the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs and monitoring orders. This case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of providing adequate support and resources to young individuals who may be at risk of engaging in criminal behavior.

### Conclusion
In conclusion, the case of the accused killer of the Tacoma visitor in January highlights the need for a comprehensive review of the juvenile justice system. By examining the details of this tragic event and exploring the implications of the accused’s prior legal history, we can work towards implementing reforms that prioritize the rehabilitation and support of young offenders. It is imperative that we learn from this case and take proactive steps to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.

Sources:
– [Example Source 1](#)
– [Example Source 2](#)
– [Example Source 3](#)