Rajasthan Court Acquits Ajmer Dargah Cleric and Others in ‘Sar Tan Se Judaa’ Slogan Case
In a recent development, a Rajasthan court has acquitted Ajmer Dargah Cleric Gauhar Chishti and five others who were accused of raising the controversial ‘Sar Tan Se Judaa’ slogan against Nupur Sharma. The slogan was raised by Chishti in a viral video back in 2022, sparking a heated debate and legal battle.
Chishti, who is the Khadim of Ajmer Sharif Dargah, found himself at the center of a controversy when the video of him raising the slogan against Nupur Sharma went viral. The slogan, which translates to ‘separate the head from the body,’ was seen as inflammatory and derogatory by many.
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
The acquittal by the Rajasthan court comes as a relief to Chishti and the other accused, who have maintained their innocence throughout the legal proceedings. The court’s decision to clear them of all charges is seen as a victory for freedom of speech and expression.
This latest development in the case has sparked mixed reactions from the public, with some supporting the court’s decision and others expressing disappointment. The controversy surrounding the ‘Sar Tan Se Judaa’ slogan is likely to continue to be a topic of debate and discussion in the future.
Overall, the acquittal of Ajmer Dargah Cleric Gauhar Chishti and the other accused in the ‘Sar Tan Se Judaa’ slogan case marks a significant moment in the ongoing legal saga. It remains to be seen how this decision will impact the future of free speech and expression in India.
BREAKING NEWS Rajasthan Court acquits Ajmer Dargah Cleric & 5 others accused of raising ‘Sar Tan Se J*uda’ slogan against Nupur Sharma.
Gauhar Chishti had raised this slogan against Nupur Sharma in the viral video in 2022.
Chishti is the Khadim of Ajmer Sharif Dargah. Police… pic.twitter.com/Vezbi76P9f
— Times Algebra (@TimesAlgebraIND) July 16, 2024
In a surprising turn of events, a Rajasthan Court has acquitted Ajmer Dargah Cleric Gauhar Chishti and five others who were accused of raising the controversial ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ slogan against Nupur Sharma. This incident, which took place in a viral video in 2022, caused quite a stir and led to legal action being taken against the individuals involved.
Who is Gauhar Chishti and what is his role at Ajmer Sharif Dargah?
Gauhar Chishti is the Khadim of the revered Ajmer Sharif Dargah, a prominent Sufi shrine in Rajasthan. As a Khadim, Chishti holds a position of authority and responsibility within the Dargah, overseeing various religious and administrative duties.
What is the significance of the ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ slogan?
The ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ slogan, which translates to ‘separate the head from the body’, was raised against Nupur Sharma, a political figure, in the viral video that circulated in 2022. The slogan is highly inflammatory and has been interpreted as a threat to Sharma’s life, leading to legal action being taken against those responsible for its utterance.
What led to the acquittal of Gauhar Chishti and the other accused individuals?
The Rajasthan Court’s decision to acquit Gauhar Chishti and the five others accused of raising the ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ slogan against Nupur Sharma was based on lack of sufficient evidence to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The court found that there was no concrete proof linking the accused to the controversial slogan, leading to their exoneration.
How has this verdict impacted the ongoing controversy surrounding the incident?
The acquittal of Gauhar Chishti and the other accused individuals has added a new layer of complexity to the ongoing controversy surrounding the ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ slogan incident. While some view the court’s decision as a miscarriage of justice, others see it as a necessary outcome based on the lack of evidence against the accused.
What are the implications of this verdict for Nupur Sharma and her supporters?
The acquittal of Gauhar Chishti and the other accused individuals raises questions about the validity of the charges brought against them and the impact of the controversy on Nupur Sharma and her supporters. Some may see the court’s decision as a setback for Sharma and a victory for Chishti, while others may view it as a missed opportunity for justice to be served.
In conclusion, the acquittal of Gauhar Chishti and the five others accused of raising the ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ slogan against Nupur Sharma has sparked debate and controversy. The court’s decision highlights the importance of evidence in legal proceedings and raises questions about the validity of the charges brought against the accused individuals. As the story continues to unfold, it is essential to consider the implications of this verdict on all parties involved and the broader implications for freedom of speech and expression in India.