SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY
1. Arvind Kejriwal judgment
2. Supreme Court ruling
3. ED arrest powers
#BREAKING
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
In the Arvind Kejriwal judgment, the #SupremeCourt holds that ED cannot ignore materials which exculpate the accused while exercising the power to arrest.
"An officer cannot be allowed to selectively pick and choose material implicating the person to be arrested.
The Supreme Court’s judgment on Arvind Kejriwal case states that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) cannot overlook evidence that could clear the accused before making an arrest. The court emphasized that officers cannot cherry-pick incriminating evidence to justify an arrest. This decision sets a precedent for fair and unbiased investigation processes. Stay informed with the latest legal developments by following Gss on Twitter. For more details on this case, visit the link provided in the tweet. Keep up with breaking news and legal updates by staying connected on social media. #BREAKING #SupremeCourt #ArvindKejriwal #EnforcementDirectorate.
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
In the Arvind Kejriwal judgment, the #SupremeCourt holds that ED cannot ignore materials which exculpate the accused while exercising the power to arrest.
“An officer cannot be allowed to selectively pick and choose material implicating the person to be arrested.… pic.twitter.com/0d8IrFTgol
— Gss (@Gss_Views) July 12, 2024
Related Story.
In a recent groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court ruled in the Arvind Kejriwal judgment that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) cannot disregard evidence that clears the accused of wrongdoing when deciding to make an arrest. This ruling has significant implications for the justice system in India and sets a precedent for how law enforcement agencies handle arrests based on available evidence.
The case centered around the principle that officers cannot cherry-pick incriminating evidence while ignoring exculpatory evidence that may cast doubt on the guilt of the accused. The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of a fair and unbiased investigation, highlighting the need for law enforcement agencies to consider all evidence before taking drastic actions such as making an arrest.
This ruling serves as a reminder that the power to arrest should not be wielded arbitrarily or based on incomplete information. It underscores the importance of due process and the protection of individual rights, even in the face of serious allegations. By holding ED accountable for considering all relevant materials before making an arrest, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its commitment to upholding justice and fairness in the legal system.
The decision has been met with widespread acclaim from legal experts, activists, and the public at large. Many see it as a step towards ensuring accountability and transparency within law enforcement agencies. By requiring ED to thoroughly review all evidence before taking action, the Supreme Court has sent a clear message that no one is above the law, and every individual is entitled to a fair trial.
The Arvind Kejriwal judgment has sparked discussions about the importance of evidence-based decision-making in law enforcement and the need to safeguard the rights of the accused. It serves as a reminder that justice must be blind and impartial, regardless of the stature or background of the individual in question. This ruling sets a positive precedent for future cases and reinforces the principles of fairness and equality before the law.
As we reflect on this landmark judgment, it is crucial to acknowledge the role of the judiciary in upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served. The Supreme Court’s decision in the Arvind Kejriwal case demonstrates a commitment to protecting the rights of all individuals and holding law enforcement agencies accountable for their actions.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Arvind Kejriwal judgment marks a significant milestone in the Indian legal system. By emphasizing the importance of considering all evidence before making an arrest, the court has reaffirmed its commitment to justice and fairness. This decision serves as a reminder that the rule of law must be upheld at all times, and every individual is entitled to a fair trial.
