WB vs Union: CBI case maintainable: Supreme Court rules in favor of West Bengal in CBI case

1. West Bengal CBI cases
2. Supreme Court ruling West Bengal
3. State vs Union CBI consent

In a significant development, the Supreme Court has ruled that the State of West Bengal’s lawsuit against the Union regarding the registration of cases by the CBI is maintainable, despite the revocation of its general consent. This decision has important implications for the ongoing legal battle between the state government and the central investigative agency. Stay updated with the latest legal news and judgments by following Live Law on Twitter. Stay informed about the latest updates and developments in this case by following Live Law on Twitter. Keep abreast of the latest legal news and judgments by following Live Law on Twitter.

#BREAKING Supreme Court holds that the State of West Bengal’s suit against the Union over the registration of cases by the CBI despite revocation of its general consent is maintainable.

— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) July 10, 2024

Related Story.

In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court has ruled that the State of West Bengal’s lawsuit against the Union regarding the registration of cases by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is maintainable, despite the revocation of its general consent. This ruling has significant implications for the relationship between states and the central government, as well as for the autonomy of state police forces.

The case stemmed from the State of West Bengal’s decision to withdraw its general consent for the CBI to investigate cases within its jurisdiction. This move was seen as a response to perceived overreach by the central agency in certain sensitive cases. However, the Union government continued to register cases with the CBI in West Bengal, prompting the state to file a lawsuit challenging this action.

The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the maintainability of West Bengal’s suit sends a clear message about the importance of respecting the autonomy of state governments in matters of law enforcement. By affirming the state’s right to challenge the registration of cases by the CBI without its consent, the Court has upheld the principles of federalism and the division of powers between the central and state governments.

This ruling is also significant in light of the ongoing debate about the role of central investigative agencies in India. The CBI, as the premier investigative agency in the country, plays a crucial role in probing cases of corruption and other serious offenses. However, concerns have been raised about its independence and impartiality, particularly when it comes to cases involving political figures or sensitive issues.

By allowing states to challenge the registration of cases by the CBI within their jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has taken a step towards ensuring greater accountability and transparency in the functioning of central investigative agencies. This decision underscores the importance of upholding the rule of law and preventing any potential misuse of investigative powers by central agencies.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s ruling in the State of West Bengal’s case against the Union over the registration of cases by the CBI is a significant development in the ongoing debate about federalism and the autonomy of state governments. By affirming the state’s right to challenge the actions of central investigative agencies within its jurisdiction, the Court has upheld the principles of constitutionalism and the rule of law. This decision sets an important precedent for future cases involving the relationship between states and the central government, and underscores the importance of maintaining a balance of power between different levels of government in a federal system.

Source: [Live Law](https://twitter.com/LiveLawIndia/status/1810905088942297202?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw)