“Supreme Court immunity test”: Supreme Court Creates New Test for Presidential Immunity

– Presidential immunity test
– Supreme Court ruling
– DOJ interactions and immunity

The Supreme Court has established a new test for presidential immunity in a 6-3 decision. The ruling distinguishes between core constitutional acts, which afford absolute immunity, official acts, which provide presumptive immunity, and unofficial acts, which offer no immunity. Interactions with Department of Justice officials will result in absolute immunity. This decision sets a precedent for how presidential actions are viewed in terms of legal immunity. Stay updated on the latest legal developments by following Jack Posobiec on Twitter.

BREAKING: Supreme Court 6-3 creates new test for presidential immunity

– Core constitutional acts (absolute immunity)

– Official acts (presumptive immunity)

– Unofficial acts (no immunity)

Interactions with DOJ officials = absolute immunity

— Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) July 1, 2024

Related Story.

In a groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court has established a new framework for determining presidential immunity. The 6-3 ruling outlines three distinct categories of presidential actions and their corresponding levels of immunity. This ruling is set to have far-reaching implications for future interactions between the executive branch and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The first category outlined by the Supreme Court is core constitutional acts, which are deemed to warrant absolute immunity. These are actions that are directly tied to the President’s constitutional duties and responsibilities. By granting absolute immunity to these core constitutional acts, the Supreme Court is affirming the importance of protecting the President’s ability to carry out their official duties without fear of legal repercussions.

The second category, official acts, are granted presumptive immunity under the new test. Official acts are those that are performed in the course of the President’s official duties but may not be directly tied to the Constitution. This category recognizes that the President must be able to perform their duties without the constant threat of litigation, while still allowing for the possibility of legal action in certain circumstances.

Finally, the Court established that unofficial acts do not warrant immunity. Unofficial acts are those that fall outside of the President’s official duties and are not tied to the Constitution. This distinction is crucial in ensuring accountability and transparency in government, as it prevents the President from using their position to shield themselves from legal consequences for actions that are not related to their official duties.

One key aspect of the Supreme Court’s ruling is the confirmation that interactions with DOJ officials will result in absolute immunity. This provision is significant as it clarifies the scope of immunity in cases where the President is working closely with the Department of Justice. By granting absolute immunity in these interactions, the Court is ensuring that the President can effectively carry out their duties without the threat of legal challenges hindering their ability to work with DOJ officials.

Overall, the Supreme Court’s new test for presidential immunity represents a significant development in the legal landscape surrounding the powers and responsibilities of the President. By clearly delineating the levels of immunity for different types of presidential actions, the Court has provided much-needed clarity and guidance for future cases involving the executive branch.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to create a new test for presidential immunity is a landmark ruling that will have a lasting impact on the relationship between the President and the Department of Justice. By establishing clear guidelines for immunity based on the nature of presidential actions, the Court has laid the groundwork for a more transparent and accountable government. This ruling reaffirms the importance of upholding the rule of law while also recognizing the unique role and responsibilities of the President.