NewOrthodoxy member calls for cease to exist: “NewOrthodoxy Member Calls for Cease to Exist, Not Hate Crime”

1. NewOrthodoxy member calling for cessation
2. Thought Police hypocrisy
3. Hate crime double standard

In a recent tweet, Simon Fox highlights the double standard within the NewOrthodoxy movement, where calling for someone like Kemi Badenoch to “cease to exist” is not considered a hate crime. This hypocrisy raises concerns about freedom of speech and the consequences of challenging mainstream ideology. The tweet suggests that those who question this inconsistency may face scrutiny from the Thought Police, indicating a potential threat to individual expression and critical thinking. This thought-provoking message sheds light on the dangers of conforming to rigid beliefs and the importance of questioning authority in a democratic society.

Apparently when a member of the NewOrthodoxy calls for someone (e.g. Kemi Badenoch) to cease to exist, it’s NOT a hate crime. And if you think that’s hypocrisy, the Thought Police will be knocking on your door to check your thinking.

— Simon Fox (@SimonFoxWriter) June 26, 2024

Related Story.

In a recent tweet by Simon Fox, he highlighted a concerning issue regarding the double standards when it comes to calling for someone to “cease to exist.” Apparently, when a member of the NewOrthodoxy does this, it is not considered a hate crime. However, if you dare to point out the hypocrisy in this situation, you might find yourself being visited by the Thought Police to check your thinking.

The implications of this statement are quite alarming. It raises questions about freedom of speech, censorship, and the potential consequences of expressing dissenting opinions in today’s society. It seems that there is a growing trend of silencing those who dare to challenge the status quo or speak out against certain ideologies.

The concept of the Thought Police is reminiscent of George Orwell’s dystopian novel, “1984,” where the government monitors and controls the thoughts and beliefs of its citizens. While we may not be living in a totalitarian state like in the book, the idea of being policed for our thoughts is still a troubling one.

It is essential to have open and honest discussions about controversial topics without the fear of being labeled as a criminal for expressing our views. The ability to engage in dialogue, debate, and exchange ideas is fundamental to a free society. When we start to silence dissenting voices, we risk losing the diversity of thought that is necessary for progress and innovation.

The case of Kemi Badenoch serves as a prime example of how challenging the dominant narrative can lead to backlash and potential repercussions. It is crucial to remember that freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that should be protected and upheld, even when it involves uncomfortable or unpopular opinions.

In today’s digital age, where social media platforms play a significant role in shaping public discourse, it is more important than ever to be vigilant about protecting our right to freedom of expression. The power of social media can be used to amplify voices, share diverse perspectives, and hold those in positions of authority accountable.

As we navigate through an increasingly complex and divisive political landscape, it is essential to remain vigilant against any attempts to stifle freedom of speech and silence dissenting voices. We must be willing to engage in respectful and constructive dialogue, even when we disagree with one another.

In conclusion, the issue raised by Simon Fox’s tweet is a stark reminder of the importance of safeguarding our right to freedom of speech. We must resist any attempts to censor or suppress dissenting opinions and continue to advocate for open and honest discussions on critical issues facing our society. Let us strive to create a world where all voices are heard and respected, regardless of their views or beliefs.