Indian Election Commission Trust Crisis: “Indian’s Trust in Election Commission Plummets to 28%, Fear of EVM Manipulation Rises”

By | June 19, 2024

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

1. Election Commission trust decline
2. EVM manipulation fear India
3. Supreme Court inaction democracy

Breaking : CSDS survey shows trust in the Election Commission has come down to 28% from 50% , and 45% Indian’s fearing EVM manipulation.

You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage

This information is deeply troubling for a democratic nation such as India.

Why hasn't the Supreme Court taken action?

A recent CSDS survey revealed a significant decline in trust towards the Election Commission, dropping to 28% from 50%. Additionally, 45% of Indians are concerned about potential EVM manipulation. This unsettling information raises questions about the state of democracy in India. Many are wondering why the Supreme Court has not taken action to address these alarming findings. As the cornerstone of justice and fairness, it is crucial for the highest judicial body in the country to intervene and ensure the integrity of the electoral process. The need for immediate action and transparency in addressing these issues is paramount.

Related Story.

In a recent CSDS survey, it was revealed that trust in the Election Commission has plummeted to 28% from 50%, while a staggering 45% of Indians fear manipulation of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). These findings are deeply concerning for a democratic nation like India, where free and fair elections are the cornerstone of the political system. It raises the question – why hasn’t the Supreme Court taken action to address these alarming issues?

The Election Commission of India plays a crucial role in ensuring the integrity of the electoral process. It is responsible for conducting elections at various levels and upholding the principles of democracy. However, the sharp decline in public trust towards the Election Commission indicates a growing sense of skepticism among the Indian populace. This lack of trust can have far-reaching consequences, as it undermines the credibility of the electoral system and erodes the foundation of democracy.

Moreover, the fear of EVM manipulation among a significant portion of the population is a cause for serious concern. EVMs are designed to make the voting process more efficient and secure, but the perception of vulnerability to tampering can shake the public’s confidence in the electoral process. In a country as populous and diverse as India, where elections are massive undertakings involving millions of voters, any doubts about the integrity of the voting machines can have a detrimental impact on the democratic process.

Given the gravity of the situation, one would expect the Supreme Court to step in and address these issues promptly. The judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring the functioning of democratic institutions. It has the authority to intervene in matters of public interest and safeguard the rights of citizens. In this case, where the trust in the Election Commission is at an all-time low and concerns about EVM manipulation are widespread, it is imperative for the Supreme Court to take cognizance of the situation and take necessary action.

The Supreme Court has a history of intervening in matters of electoral integrity and upholding the sanctity of the democratic process. In the past, the court has issued directives and guidelines to ensure transparent and fair elections. It has also addressed issues related to EVMs and voter verifiability. However, in the current scenario where trust in the Election Commission is dwindling and fears of EVM manipulation are rampant, the Supreme Court’s silence is conspicuous.

It is crucial for the Supreme Court to proactively address the concerns raised by the CSDS survey and restore public trust in the electoral process. The court can play a pivotal role in ensuring that elections are conducted in a free, fair, and transparent manner. By taking suo-motu cognizance of the situation and initiating necessary measures to address the issues at hand, the Supreme Court can reaffirm its commitment to upholding the principles of democracy and protecting the rights of citizens.

In conclusion, the findings of the CSDS survey regarding trust in the Election Commission and fears of EVM manipulation are alarming for a democratic nation like India. The Supreme Court must not remain a silent spectator in the face of these challenges but must take proactive steps to uphold the integrity of the electoral process and restore public confidence in the democratic system. It is time for the judiciary to assert its authority and ensure that the principles of democracy are upheld.