ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญมติเอกฉันท์ ค่าเสียหายชู้ได้ขัด: BREAKING: ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ มีมติเอกฉันท์ วินิจฉัยกฎหมาย ‘สามี-ภริยา’ ฟ้องค่าเสียหายชู้ได้ขัดรัฐธรรมนูป

1. ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ
2. เอกฉันท์ วินิจฉัยกฎหมาย
3. ค่าเสียหายชู้ได้ขัดรัฐธรรมนูญ

The State Constitutional Court has ruled that the law allowing husbands and wives to sue for damages from mistresses is unconstitutional. The court’s decision on June 18, 2024, declared that a specific provision in the commercial and civil law violated the constitution. This ruling has significant implications for marital disputes and legal rights in Thailand. For more information, visit the original tweet from THE STANDARD.

BREAKING: ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญ มีมติเอกฉันท์ วินิจฉัยกฎหมายที่ให้ ‘สามี-ภริยา’ ฟ้องเรียกค่าเสียหายจากชู้ได้ขัดรัฐธรรมนูญ

วันนี้ (18 มิถุนายน) ศาลรัฐธรรมนูญมีมติเป็นเอกฉันท์ ว่าประมวลกฎหมายแพ่งและพาณิชย์ มาตรา 1523 วรรคสอง ที่บัญญัติว่า… pic.twitter.com/2hwI6NUJk8

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

— THE STANDARD (@thestandardth) June 18, 2024

Related Story.

In a recent landmark decision, the Thai Constitutional Court ruled that spouses have the right to sue for damages caused by adultery, a ruling that has sparked widespread debate and discussion. This ruling, which came on June 18, 2024, has significant implications for the legal landscape in Thailand and has raised important questions about the rights of individuals within marriage.

The case in question centered around a provision in the Thai Civil and Commercial Code that addresses adultery and its repercussions. Article 1523, paragraph two of the Code states that a spouse who commits adultery can be held liable for damages by the other spouse. However, this provision had previously been interpreted in a way that limited the ability of the aggrieved spouse to seek compensation for the harm caused by the adultery.

The Constitutional Court’s decision to uphold the right of spouses to sue for damages in cases of adultery represents a significant shift in legal interpretation. By declaring this provision of the Code to be in line with the principles of the Constitution, the Court has affirmed the importance of protecting the rights of individuals within marriage and ensuring that those who have been wronged have legal recourse.

This ruling has sparked a lively debate within legal circles and among the general public in Thailand. Some have argued that allowing spouses to sue for damages in cases of adultery is a necessary step to protect the sanctity of marriage and ensure that individuals are held accountable for their actions. Others have raised concerns about the potential for abuse of this provision and the impact it may have on personal relationships.

Regardless of the differing opinions on this issue, one thing is clear: the Constitutional Court’s decision has opened up a new chapter in the legal landscape of Thailand. It has underscored the importance of upholding the rights of individuals within marriage and ensuring that the law provides adequate protection for those who have been wronged.

Moving forward, it will be important to closely monitor the implementation of this ruling and its impact on the legal system in Thailand. As cases involving adultery and damages make their way through the courts, it will be interesting to see how this new interpretation of the law plays out in practice and what implications it may have for individuals and families across the country.

In conclusion, the Constitutional Court’s decision to uphold the right of spouses to sue for damages in cases of adultery is a significant development in Thai law. It highlights the importance of protecting the rights of individuals within marriage and ensuring that the legal system provides avenues for redress in cases of wrongdoing. As this ruling is implemented and its impact is felt, it will be crucial to continue the dialogue around this issue and consider how best to balance the rights of individuals within the context of marriage.