Big Breaking EVM Remote BJP: Election Portal Operator’s Phone Used to Unlock EVMs: New Revelations

1. Election fraud manipulation
2. EVM security breach
3. Political conspiracy remote control

In a shocking revelation, it has been uncovered that the election portal operator’s phone used to unlock EVMs was in the possession of Waikar’s relative. This raises concerns about the integrity of the electoral process, with allegations that Narendra Modi and BJP are reluctant to ban EVMs due to having control over them. The controversy has sparked discussions on social media, with hashtags like #DhruvRathee, #Beef, #AjeetBharti, #RahulGandhi, and #Congress trending. The implications of this revelation are significant, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral system.

BIG BREAKING

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

The election portal operator’s phone used to unlock the EVMs was used by Waikar’s relative.

This is why Narendra Modi and BJP don’t want to ban EVM because they have the remote.#DhruvRathee #Beef #AjeetBharti #RahulGandhi #Congress pic.twitter.com/zkeQ6esL3i

— Dhruv Rathee (Parody) (@dhruvrahtee) June 16, 2024

Related Story.

In a recent shocking revelation, it has come to light that the phone used by the election portal operator to unlock the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) was actually used by a relative of Waikar. This alarming discovery raises serious concerns about the integrity and security of the electoral process in India.

The implications of this discovery are significant and have sparked widespread debate and speculation. Many are now questioning the motives behind the reluctance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to ban EVMs, despite growing calls for their abolition. The suggestion that they may have access to the remote control of the EVMs through this phone has caused a stir among political circles and the public alike.

This revelation has also brought to light the issue of potential manipulation and tampering of election results. The use of the election portal operator’s phone by a relative of a political figure raises concerns about the fairness and transparency of the electoral process. It raises questions about the extent to which political parties may have control over the voting system and the potential for them to influence the outcome of elections.

The involvement of individuals close to political leaders in such sensitive matters raises serious ethical and legal questions. It is essential for the integrity of the democratic process that elections are free from any form of interference or manipulation. The use of personal devices in the electoral process opens the door to potential abuse and compromises the trust of the public in the electoral system.

The implications of this revelation go beyond just the current election cycle. It raises broader questions about the security and reliability of the electoral process in India. The use of EVMs has been a topic of controversy and debate for many years, with concerns about their vulnerability to tampering and hacking. This latest revelation only adds fuel to the fire and reinforces the need for greater transparency and accountability in the electoral process.

In light of these developments, it is imperative that a thorough investigation be conducted to determine the extent of any potential wrongdoing and to ensure that the electoral process remains fair and free from any form of manipulation. The public has a right to know that their votes are being counted accurately and that the outcome of elections truly reflects the will of the people.

In conclusion, the use of the election portal operator’s phone by a relative of Waikar raises serious questions about the integrity and security of the electoral process in India. The implications of this revelation are significant and call into question the motives of political leaders who are reluctant to ban EVMs. It is crucial that steps are taken to address these concerns and to safeguard the democratic process for the future.