1. SC sacks judge disbarred
2. Former driver’s wages judge disbarred
3. South Carolina judge collecting wages
The Supreme Court has dismissed and disbarred a municipal trial court judge in Calamba City, Laguna, for falsifying public documents to continue receiving her former driver’s wages. Judge Sharon Alamada-Magayanes was found guilty of falsification of official documents, serious dishonesty, and gross misconduct. Her corespondents were also penalized for their involvement in the falsification. The court emphasized the importance of judges maintaining irreproachable conduct and being free from any appearance of impropriety. Alamada’s actions were deemed to show moral depravity and fell short of the standards expected of a magistrate. The severity of her offenses led to her disbarment.
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
Related Story.
The recent decision by the Supreme Court to sack and disbar a municipal trial court judge in Calamba City, Laguna has sent shockwaves through the legal community. Judge Sharon Alamada-Magayanes was found guilty of falsifying public documents in order to continue receiving the salaries of her contractual driver who had already resigned. This egregious act of dishonesty and misconduct has led to her dismissal and disbarment from the practice of law.
In a 42-page decision, the Supreme Court en banc ruled that Judge Alamada-Magayanes, along with court clerk Rachel Worwor-Miguel and court stenographer Beverly de Jesus, were all guilty of falsification and serious dishonesty. The judge confessed to signing payroll registers for her driver and certifying that he rendered service, even though he had already resigned. The court noted that the driver’s salaries were still being credited to his ATM card and consistently withdrawn at the judge’s instructions.
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of upholding the integrity of the judiciary and maintaining the highest standards of conduct for judges. Judge Alamada-Magayanes’ actions were deemed to show moral depravity and a failure to meet the ethical requirements of a magistrate of the law. The court stated that judges must be irreproachable in their conduct and free from any appearance of impropriety.
The decision to dismiss and disbar Judge Alamada-Magayanes was based on the severity of her offenses, lack of remorse, and the multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability. The court emphasized that her false certifications and misappropriation of her staff’s salaries constituted gross misconduct and serious dishonesty, which are serious offenses in the legal profession.
The Supreme Court’s ruling serves as a reminder to all members of the judiciary that they are held to the highest ethical standards and must uphold the integrity of the legal system. Judges are expected to act with honesty, integrity, and transparency in all their dealings, and any deviation from these principles will not be tolerated.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision to sack and disbar Judge Alamada-Magayanes for collecting her former driver’s wages sends a clear message that unethical conduct will not be condoned in the legal profession. Upholding the rule of law and maintaining the public’s trust in the judiciary are paramount, and any breach of these principles will be met with swift and decisive action.