Breaking News: Modi’s Minister Jeetan Ram Manjhi”: “Ram is fictional and Ravan is superior: Jitan Ram Manjhi

1. Hindu mythology
2. Ramayana
3. Lord Rama and Ravana

In a shocking statement, Cabinet Minister Jeetan Ram Manjhi claimed that Lord Ram is fictional and Ravan is superior. This controversial statement has sparked a debate on social media. The minister’s remarks have stirred up a storm of reactions from different quarters. The statement has drawn criticism from various political and religious groups. The tweet by Dr. Manmohan Singh Satire has gone viral, with many expressing outrage and disbelief. The statement has caused a frenzy on social media, with netizens divided over the minister’s comments. The controversy is likely to have far-reaching implications in the political landscape.

BREAKING

“भगवान राम काल्पनिक है और रावण श्रेष्ठ”

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

: जीतन राम मांझी (मोदी जी के कैबिनेट मंत्री) pic.twitter.com/95GfRvHtjZ

— Dr.Manmohan Singh Satire (@LegendEconomist) June 10, 2024

Related Story.

In a recent shocking statement, Jitan Ram Manjhi, a cabinet minister in the Modi government, declared that “भगवान राम काल्पनिक है और रावण श्रेष्ठ” which translates to “Lord Ram is fictional and Ravan is superior.” This controversial statement has stirred up a storm of reactions across the country, with many people expressing outrage and disbelief at such a statement coming from a government official.

The statement has sparked a heated debate on social media platforms, with people from all walks of life weighing in on the matter. While some have criticized Manjhi for his remarks, others have come out in support of him, citing freedom of speech and expression as their justification.

Manjhi’s statement has also brought into question the role of mythology and religion in contemporary society. The Ramayana, a revered epic in Hindu mythology, tells the story of Lord Ram’s quest to rescue his wife Sita from the demon king Ravan. For centuries, this tale has been a cornerstone of Hindu beliefs and values, shaping the cultural and religious landscape of India.

However, Manjhi’s assertion that Lord Ram is a fictional character challenges these deeply held beliefs, leading to a reevaluation of the significance of mythology in modern times. It raises questions about the interpretation of religious texts and the impact of such interpretations on society as a whole.

Moreover, Manjhi’s statement has political implications as well. As a member of the ruling government, his words carry weight and influence public opinion. The BJP, the party to which Manjhi belongs, has a strong base of support among Hindu nationalists who hold Lord Ram in high regard. Manjhi’s remarks could potentially alienate this voter base and create rifts within the party itself.

In response to the controversy, Manjhi has stood by his statement, stating that he was expressing his personal opinion and that everyone is entitled to their own beliefs. He has also emphasized the need for open dialogue and debate on religious matters, urging people to respect differing viewpoints.

The fallout from Manjhi’s statement is likely to continue in the coming days, with reactions pouring in from all quarters. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the need to respect religious sentiments. In a diverse and pluralistic society like India, where beliefs and traditions are deeply intertwined, it is important to approach such sensitive topics with sensitivity and understanding.

As the debate rages on, one thing is clear – the statement made by Jitan Ram Manjhi has sparked a conversation that goes beyond just religion and politics. It forces us to reflect on the nature of belief, the power of storytelling, and the complexities of faith in a rapidly changing world. And as we navigate through these discussions, it is crucial to remember that ultimately, it is our shared humanity that unites us, regardless of our differences in opinion or belief.