SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY
1. Twitter hack and leak operation
2. Hunter Biden laptop story
3. FBI confirms laptop authenticity
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
BREAKING: In 2020, Twitter disclosed to the FEC they were warned of ‘a hack and leak operation involving Hunter Biden’ by federal law enforcement that led them to censor the laptop story
The disclosure was signed by Yoel Roth
The FBI just admitted the laptop is real
In a shocking revelation, Twitter disclosed to the FEC in 2020 that they were warned by federal law enforcement about a ‘hack and leak operation involving Hunter Biden’, leading them to censor the laptop story. The disclosure was signed by Yoel Roth, and now the FBI has confirmed the authenticity of the laptop. This information was shared by Jack Poso on Twitter, sparking further controversy and raising questions about censorship and media manipulation. Stay informed about this developing story and the implications it may have on the political landscape. Follow Jack Poso for more updates. #HunterBiden #Twitter #FBI #Censorship #JackPoso
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
BREAKING: In 2020, Twitter disclosed to the FEC they were warned of ‘a hack and leak operation involving Hunter Biden’ by federal law enforcement that led them to censor the laptop story
The disclosure was signed by Yoel Roth
The FBI just admitted the laptop is real pic.twitter.com/OSm4cNddae
— Jack Poso (@JackPosobiec) June 5, 2024
Related Story.
In a shocking revelation, Twitter disclosed to the FEC in 2020 that they had been warned by federal law enforcement about a potential hack and leak operation involving Hunter Biden. This information led Twitter to censor the laptop story that was circulating at the time. The disclosure, signed by Yoel Roth, sheds light on the behind-the-scenes actions taken by Twitter in response to the situation.
The FBI’s recent admission that the laptop is indeed real adds another layer of complexity to this already controversial story. With new information coming to light, it raises questions about the motivations behind Twitter’s decision to censor the story and the implications it may have had on public perception.
The involvement of federal law enforcement in alerting Twitter to the potential hack and leak operation adds a sense of urgency and seriousness to the situation. It underscores the importance of cybersecurity and the need for platforms like Twitter to take swift action in response to potential threats.
The fact that Twitter chose to censor the laptop story based on this information raises concerns about the role of social media platforms in shaping the narrative around important political issues. It highlights the power that these platforms have in controlling the flow of information and the potential impact that censorship can have on public discourse.
As the story continues to unfold, it will be important to stay informed and critically analyze the information being presented. With the FBI’s confirmation of the laptop’s authenticity, it raises questions about the validity of the information that was initially censored by Twitter. It also brings into question the platform’s responsibility in handling sensitive political content.
Moving forward, it will be crucial for Twitter and other social media platforms to be transparent about their decision-making processes and to ensure that they are upholding principles of free speech and open dialogue. The events surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop story serve as a reminder of the important role that social media plays in shaping public opinion and the need for accountability in how these platforms operate.
Overall, the recent developments in this story highlight the complexities of navigating the intersection of technology, politics, and information dissemination. It is a reminder of the power dynamics at play in the digital age and the need for vigilance in protecting the integrity of our public discourse.
