Journalists fail to fact-check on Michael Cohen: Failed Fact-Check: Michael Cohen Investigation Source Revealed

1. Michael Cohen investigation origins
2. Unsealed warrants media coalition
3. Fact-checking failure journalists

Failed fact-checking is highlighted in this tweet showing three journalists missing the mark. The investigation into Michael Cohen’s origins is revealed through unsealed warrants, thanks to a media coalition including NYT. It stemmed from a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) triggered by substantial payments. The tweet, posted by emptywheel, sheds light on the importance of accurate reporting and fact-checking in journalism. Stay informed and verify sources to ensure credibility in news reporting.

Here’s an example of failed fact-checking with THREE different journalists.

First, we KNOW where the investigation into Michael Cohen came from, bc those warrants have been unsealed (thanks in part to media coalition including NYT). It came from a SAR based off big $$ payments… pic.twitter.com/Z4fesUOihV

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

— emptywheel (synonym: foil) (@emptywheel) May 31, 2024

Related Story.

If you’ve ever wondered about the importance of fact-checking in journalism, a recent incident involving three different journalists sheds light on just how crucial it is to get the facts right. In a tweet from @emptywheel, the user highlighted a case of failed fact-checking regarding the investigation into Michael Cohen.

The tweet points out that the warrants related to the investigation into Michael Cohen have been unsealed, thanks in part to a media coalition that includes The New York Times. These warrants reveal that the investigation originated from a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) based on significant financial transactions.

This example serves as a reminder of the responsibility that journalists have to verify information before publishing it. In the age of social media and instant news dissemination, the pressure to be the first to report a story can sometimes lead to oversights in fact-checking. However, as this case demonstrates, failing to verify information can have serious consequences and undermine the credibility of journalists and media outlets.

Fact-checking is a crucial step in the journalistic process, as it ensures that the information being reported is accurate and reliable. In today’s fast-paced media landscape, where misinformation can spread rapidly, it is more important than ever for journalists to take the time to verify their sources and corroborate the information they are presenting to the public.

In the case of the investigation into Michael Cohen, the unsealed warrants provided a clear trail of where the information originated from. By failing to fact-check this information, the journalists involved in the incident missed a crucial opportunity to provide their audience with accurate and verified reporting.

This incident serves as a valuable lesson for journalists and media professionals alike. It underscores the importance of taking the time to verify information, no matter how urgent the need to report a story may seem. By prioritizing accuracy and fact-checking, journalists can uphold the integrity of their profession and ensure that the information they provide to the public is trustworthy and reliable.

In conclusion, the example of failed fact-checking with three different journalists highlights the importance of verifying information before publishing it. By taking the time to fact-check and corroborate sources, journalists can ensure that their reporting is accurate and reliable. In today’s media landscape, where misinformation can spread rapidly, upholding the principles of accuracy and integrity is more important than ever.