Robert Pairman : “Empower the Masses: Let the People Decide on Lead Stories”

By | May 27, 2024

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

Accident – Death – Obituary News : : 1. Democratic decision-making
2. Public opinion leadership

The group of Jamaicans who identify as Tainos are advocating for a referendum to settle the issue of the country’s final court. Robert Pairman, Kasike/Chief Kalaan at the Yamaye Guani Council, stated that there is a divide within the group on whether Jamaica should remain under the Privy Council or join the Caribbean Court of Justice. However, Dr Christopher Charles, a professor at the University of the West Indies, argues that a referendum could lead to politicization similar to the Brexit situation in the UK. He believes the decision should be made in Parliament. The debate continues as both sides present their arguments.

You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage

1. Empower the masses
2. People-driven narratives

Group of Jamaican Tainos Calls for Referendum on Jamaica’s Final Court

In a recent development, the group of Jamaicans who identify as Tainos have voiced their opinion on the issue of Jamaica’s final court, advocating for a referendum to settle the longstanding debate. Robert Pairman, Kasike/Chief Kalaan at the Yamaye Guani Council, representing the Jamaican Tainos, emphasized the importance of citizen involvement in determining the country’s judicial future.

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

Pairman highlighted the ongoing discussions within the group, which is currently seeking Indigenous People status. With differing opinions on whether Jamaica should remain under the jurisdiction of the Privy Council or accede to the Caribbean Court of Justice, the Tainos are exploring all perspectives before reaching a consensus.

Expressing his belief in the democratic process, Pairman stated, “I believe what really needs to happen is that it really needs to be a decision made by the people of Jamaica. What the people agree on is what everyone should work with, so a referendum.”

Concerns Over Politicization of the Issue

However, Dr Christopher Charles, a professor of political and social psychology at the University of the West Indies, presented a contrasting view to the Tainos’ stance. He cautioned against the potential politicization of the decision-making process, drawing parallels to the Brexit referendum in the United Kingdom.

Charles argued that the decision on Jamaica’s final court could be made through Parliament as outlined in the Constitution or through a referendum, echoing previous statements by Prime Minister Andrew Holness. He raised questions about the historical context of colonialism and oppression, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach to such crucial matters.

Highlighting the risks associated with a referendum, Charles warned of partisan divisions and the influence of political agendas on the outcome. Drawing parallels to the Brexit aftermath, he emphasized the importance of informed decision-making and comprehensive understanding of the implications.

Pointing out the financial burden and logistical challenges of pursuing cases in London, Charles advocated for the Caribbean Court of Justice as a viable alternative. He emphasized the need for a more accessible and culturally sensitive judicial system that aligns with Jamaica’s independence and values.

Opposition Leader’s Stance

Opposition Leader Mark Golding weighed in on the debate, underscoring the party’s stance on Jamaica’s final court and its implications for the monarchy. Golding emphasized the role of Parliament in making such critical decisions, aligning with the constitutional framework and democratic principles.

As the discourse continues on Jamaica’s judicial future, the voices of different stakeholders contribute to a nuanced understanding of the complexities involved. The call for a referendum reflects the Tainos’ commitment to participatory democracy, while concerns over politicization underscore the need for careful deliberation and informed decision-making.

For more information on this developing story, contact kimone.francis@gleanerjm.com