SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY
1. Exclusive delegate selection
2. Exclusive Dominion voting machine lobbyist
3. Exclusive RNC Convention placement
EXCLUSIVE:
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
A Dominion voting machine lobbyist named John Garst was originally put forward to be a Trump delegate by someone on President Trump’s national campaign team for Georgia ahead of the RNC Convention in July.
This is still an active link on President Trump’s campaign
Learn about the controversy surrounding Dominion voting machines as a lobbyist named John Garst was set to be a Trump delegate in Georgia. This exclusive information sheds light on potential connections between the voting machine company and the former President’s campaign team. The tweet by Laura Loomer highlights the ongoing link between Garst and Trump’s campaign, raising questions about the integrity of the electoral process. Stay informed on the latest developments in this story by following Laura Loomer on Twitter. Stay updated with the latest news and insights into the political landscape surrounding voting machines and election integrity. #Dominion #Trump #ElectionIntegrity
EXCLUSIVE:
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
A Dominion voting machine lobbyist named John Garst was originally put forward to be a Trump delegate by someone on President Trump’s national campaign team for Georgia ahead of the RNC Convention in July.
This is still an active link on President Trump’s campaign… pic.twitter.com/0OdvAtbBwo
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) May 20, 2024
Related Story.
The recent revelation about a Dominion voting machine lobbyist named John Garst being considered as a Trump delegate by someone on President Trump’s national campaign team for Georgia has caused quite a stir. The news, first reported by Laura Loomer on Twitter, has raised concerns about the potential conflict of interest and the integrity of the electoral process.
According to the tweet by Laura Loomer, the link to John Garst’s involvement in the Trump campaign is still active on President Trump’s campaign website. This raises questions about the transparency and accountability of the campaign team, especially in light of the controversy surrounding Dominion voting machines in the 2020 presidential election.
The fact that a lobbyist for a voting machine company was being considered as a delegate for a presidential campaign is alarming, to say the least. It calls into question the independence and impartiality of the electoral process, as well as the potential influence of special interests on the outcome of elections.
The issue of election integrity has been a hot topic in recent years, with concerns about the security and reliability of electronic voting machines. The controversy surrounding Dominion voting machines, in particular, has fueled speculation and conspiracy theories about the validity of election results.
The decision to consider a Dominion voting machine lobbyist as a Trump delegate highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the electoral process. It also underscores the importance of ensuring that elections are free from any undue influence or interference.
As the 2024 presidential election approaches, it is crucial that all stakeholders, including political campaigns, election officials, and the public, work together to safeguard the integrity of the electoral process. This includes ensuring that voting machines are secure, transparent, and free from any potential conflicts of interest.
In conclusion, the revelation about John Garst being considered as a Trump delegate by someone on President Trump’s national campaign team raises important questions about the integrity of the electoral process. It serves as a reminder of the need for greater transparency and accountability in elections, as well as the importance of safeguarding the independence and impartiality of the electoral process. It is essential that all stakeholders work together to ensure that elections are free, fair, and transparent.
