Deshawn Coleman : AI tool in criminal cases faces legal challenges

Accident – Death – Obituary News : : 1. AI forensic tool legal challenges
2. Criminal case AI tool controversy

Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors from Colorado to New York have been using a little-known artificial intelligence tool called Cybercheck to help investigate and convict suspects of serious crimes like murder. However, defense lawyers have raised concerns about its accuracy and transparency, as it hasn’t been independently vetted. Created by Adam Mosher, Cybercheck uses machine learning to analyze open-source intelligence from the web to identify suspects in criminal cases. Despite claims of high accuracy, defense lawyers have demanded access to the software’s code and algorithm. Recent cases have highlighted discrepancies in Mosher’s expert testimony, raising doubts about the tool’s reliability.

Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors from across the United Kingdom have increasingly relied on a lesser-known artificial intelligence tool known as Cybercheck to aid in the investigation and prosecution of serious crimes such as murder and human trafficking. Developed by Adam Mosher, Cybercheck utilises machine learning to sift through vast amounts of open source intelligence found on the internet, including social media profiles and email addresses, to help identify potential suspects and gather crucial information in criminal cases.

Despite its growing popularity among law enforcement, Cybercheck has faced scrutiny from defence lawyers who question its accuracy and reliability. The software’s methodology has been called into question for its lack of transparency and independent verification. While Mosher claims that Cybercheck boasts an accuracy rate of over 90% and can perform research in a fraction of the time it would take a human, critics argue that the software’s inner workings remain a mystery.

In a recent case in the UK, a judge prohibited the use of Cybercheck evidence after finding that prosecutors had failed to establish its reliability. Similar challenges have arisen in other jurisdictions, with defence lawyers demanding access to Cybercheck’s proprietary code and algorithm to ensure a fair trial for their clients. The debate over the use of AI technology in criminal proceedings raises important questions about due process and the integrity of the justice system.

As the controversy surrounding Cybercheck continues to unfold, defence lawyers in the UK are pushing for greater transparency from Mosher and Global Intelligence Inc., the company behind the software. Questions have been raised about the software’s ability to preserve data used in creating cyber profiles and its methodology for verifying information gathered from the web. In a recent filing, defence lawyers highlighted discrepancies in Mosher’s testimony and his claims about the software’s peer review process.

The use of AI technology in criminal investigations presents a complex legal and ethical dilemma. While proponents argue that tools like Cybercheck can expedite the process of gathering evidence and identifying suspects, critics warn of the potential for bias, error, and infringement on civil liberties. As the legal system grapples with the implications of AI in law enforcement, the debate over Cybercheck serves as a cautionary tale about the need for transparency, accountability, and oversight in the use of advanced technology in criminal justice.