Daszak Virology Samples Wuhan: Daszak confirms 15,000 virus samples in Wuhan freezers

By | April 13, 2024

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

1. EcoHealth Wuhan Institute of Virology samples
2. Daszak CoV genomes
3. Wuhan Institute of Virology research samples

Daszak also confirms that EcoHealth and Wuhan Institute of Virology "have 15,000 samples in freezers in Wuhan, and could do the full genomes of the 700+ CoVs we've identified," contradicting his previous false claim that EcoHealth/WIV had published all of the CoVs they…

Daszak from EcoHealth and Wuhan Institute of Virology have 15,000 samples in freezers in Wuhan, contradicting previous claims about published CoVs. This revelation raises questions about the transparency of their research and the potential for undiscovered viruses. The ability to do full genomes of the identified 700+ CoVs indicates a vast reservoir of information that could shed light on the origins and behavior of these viruses. The implications of this new information could have far-reaching consequences for our understanding of viral evolution and the risks of future pandemics. Stay informed about the latest developments in virology and public health.

You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

Related Story.

In a recent tweet by Richard H. Ebright, a shocking revelation was made regarding the samples stored in freezers at the EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan Institute of Virology. Daszak, a prominent figure in the field, confirmed that they have a staggering 15,000 samples in freezers in Wuhan. What’s even more astounding is that they have the capability to conduct full genome sequencing of over 700 Coronaviruses that have been identified.

This revelation contradicts Daszak’s previous claim that EcoHealth and WIV had already published all of the Coronaviruses they had discovered. It raises questions about the transparency and integrity of the research conducted at these institutions. With such a vast number of samples at their disposal, one can’t help but wonder what other discoveries and findings are yet to be made public.

The implications of this revelation are significant. Full genome sequencing of these samples could provide invaluable insights into the origins and evolution of Coronaviruses, including the infamous COVID-19. It could potentially shed light on how these viruses jump from animals to humans and help in the development of more effective prevention and treatment strategies.

The fact that these samples are stored in freezers in Wuhan, the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic, adds another layer of complexity to the situation. It raises concerns about biosecurity and the potential risks associated with conducting such research in close proximity to where outbreaks can occur.

While the scientific community may be excited about the prospect of analyzing these samples, the general public may have mixed feelings. The idea of thousands of potentially dangerous viruses being stored in freezers can be unsettling. It underscores the importance of strict safety protocols and regulations in place to prevent any accidental release or misuse of these samples.

It also highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in scientific research, especially when it comes to studying highly infectious pathogens. The public has a right to know what research is being conducted and what risks are involved. Only through open communication and collaboration can we ensure that research is conducted ethically and responsibly.

In conclusion, the revelation made by Daszak about the samples stored in freezers at EcoHealth and WIV is both fascinating and concerning. It opens up a world of possibilities for scientific discovery but also raises important questions about safety, transparency, and accountability in research. As we await further developments in this story, it serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between scientific progress and ethical considerations in the pursuit of knowledge.

Source:
– Richard H. Ebright’s tweet: https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1778930829563191562?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw