Ghazipur DM Encourages Attendance at Varanasi Event with Sewa Bharti #ModiToolkit

By | March 31, 2024

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

1. GhazipurDM Varanasi event RSS
2. Sewa Bharti Shivaji tickets
3. Committed Bureaucracy ModiToolkit

In this Nov 2023 video, the #GhazipurDM urges people to attend a Varanasi event of RSS front Sewa Bharti on Shivaji & says people can "get their tickets from the RSS office".

You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage

Prime example of 'Committed Bureaucracy' integral to #ModiToolkit for Elected Dictators

In a November 2023 video, the Ghazipur District Magistrate encourages attendance at a Varanasi event organized by the RSS front Sewa Bharti, focusing on Shivaji. He mentions that people can obtain tickets for the event from the RSS office. This situation highlights the concept of ‘Committed Bureaucracy’ that is essential to the Modi Toolkit for Elected Dictators. The tweet, shared by Siddharth, sheds light on the alignment between government officials and political agendas, raising questions about the independence and neutrality of bureaucratic institutions. It underscores the influence of political ideologies on administrative decisions and actions.

Related Story.

In a recent video from November 2023, the #GhazipurDM is seen urging people to attend an event in Varanasi organized by the RSS front Sewa Bharti, focusing on the topic of Shivaji. The video also mentions that people can obtain their tickets for the event from the RSS office. This incident has been highlighted as a prime example of ‘Committed Bureaucracy’ that is seen as integral to the #ModiToolkit for Elected Dictators.

The involvement of a District Magistrate (DM) in promoting an event organized by a political organization like the RSS has raised concerns about the impartiality of civil servants. The DM is a government official responsible for maintaining law and order in the district and ensuring the welfare of its residents. By actively endorsing an event organized by a specific political group, the DM may be seen as compromising their neutrality and impartiality.

The RSS, or Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, is a right-wing Hindu nationalist organization that has strong ties to the ruling party in India, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Sewa Bharti is one of the many fronts of the RSS that focuses on social service activities. By promoting an event organized by Sewa Bharti, the DM is seen as aligning with the ideologies and agendas of the RSS and the BJP, raising questions about the independence of civil servants in a democratic system.

The concept of ‘Committed Bureaucracy’ refers to a scenario where civil servants are expected to be loyal and committed to the ruling political party or ideology, rather than being impartial and serving the interests of the public. This type of bureaucracy can undermine the principles of democracy and lead to a concentration of power in the hands of elected officials, turning them into de facto dictators.

The #ModiToolkit, mentioned in the tweet, is a term used to describe the strategies and tactics employed by the government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. It is often associated with the centralization of power, control over institutions, and the promotion of a specific ideology. The incident involving the #GhazipurDM is seen as a manifestation of these strategies, where even civil servants are expected to align with the ruling party’s agenda.

Critics argue that incidents like this highlight the erosion of institutional independence and the politicization of the bureaucracy in India. Civil servants are supposed to be neutral and impartial, serving the interests of the public rather than any particular political party or ideology. When they are seen as endorsing events or activities organized by political groups, it raises questions about their integrity and professionalism.

In conclusion, the incident involving the #GhazipurDM promoting an event organized by the RSS front Sewa Bharti is a stark reminder of the challenges faced by civil servants in maintaining their neutrality and independence. It also sheds light on the concept of ‘Committed Bureaucracy’ and its implications for democratic governance. As citizens, it is important to be vigilant and hold our institutions accountable to ensure that they continue to serve the public interest above all else.