News industry passive voice”: “Major changes in news industry: Passive voice now dominant

1. News industry passive voice usage
2. Media industry reporting style
3. Impact of passive voice in news reporting

The tweet by Michael Harriot highlights a concerning trend in the news industry where passive voice is being used to report on important issues. This can obscure the true impact of events such as the overturning of reproductive rights, dismantling of affirmative action & DEI policies, and the deaths of over 30,000 Palestinians in Gaza. By using passive voice, the media may be avoiding accountability and responsibility in their reporting. It is important for readers to be aware of this trend and to seek out sources that provide clear and transparent information on these critical issues.

All of a sudden, the entire news industry is ONLY using passive voice, like:

“Today, reproductive rights have been overturned while affirmative action & DEI policies are being dismantled, as more than 30,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza.”

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

We can see what you’re doing.

— Michael Harriot (@michaelharriot) March 14, 2024

Related Story.

In recent times, there has been a noticeable shift in the way news is being reported. The use of passive voice has become predominant, with headlines such as, “Today, reproductive rights have been overturned while affirmative action & DEI policies are being dismantled, as more than 30,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza.” This trend has not gone unnoticed, as journalist Michael Harriot (@michaelharriot) pointed out on Twitter.

Passive voice is a grammatical construction where the subject of the sentence is the receiver of the action, rather than the doer. While passive voice has its place in writing, its overuse in news reporting can lead to a lack of clarity and transparency. When news outlets consistently use passive voice, it can obscure the true nature of events and disengage readers from the information being presented.

By employing passive voice, news outlets can manipulate the narrative and shift blame away from the responsible parties. This can have serious consequences, as it allows for the evasion of accountability and prevents readers from fully understanding the implications of the news being reported. In the example provided by Harriot, the use of passive voice diminishes the gravity of the situations described and fails to convey the urgency of the issues at hand.

It is crucial for journalists and news organizations to maintain transparency and objectivity in their reporting. By using active voice, where the subject performs the action, journalists can clearly attribute responsibility and provide a more accurate representation of events. Active voice is more engaging and direct, allowing readers to connect with the information on a deeper level.

In a time where misinformation and manipulation run rampant, it is essential for the news industry to uphold the principles of honest and unbiased reporting. The use of passive voice can erode trust in the media and contribute to a sense of confusion among readers. By prioritizing clarity and accountability, journalists can better serve the public and fulfill their role as watchdogs of society.

As consumers of news, it is important to be aware of the language used in reporting and to question the motives behind the choice of words. By staying informed and critically analyzing the information presented to us, we can hold news outlets accountable and demand a higher standard of journalism.

In conclusion, the prevalence of passive voice in news reporting is a concerning trend that can have far-reaching implications. By recognizing the importance of language in shaping perceptions and understanding, we can work towards a more transparent and responsible media landscape. It is up to both journalists and readers to uphold the values of truth and integrity in the pursuit of accurate and impactful news coverage.