SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY
1. Netanyahu Hamas payment scheme
2. Barak allegations Hamas funding
3. Israel divide and rule strategy Hamas
THE FOREVER WAR Netanyahu deliberately boosted Hamas – by paying "protection money" – to try to ensure there would never be a Palestinian state, says ex PM Barak. And a former intel chief says Israel agreed that Hamas be paid $US 1.4 Billion as part of a divide-and-rule strategy
In a shocking revelation, former Israeli Prime Minister Barak claims that Netanyahu deliberately supported Hamas by paying “protection money” to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state. Additionally, a former intelligence chief alleges that Israel agreed to pay Hamas a staggering $US 1.4 billion as part of a divide-and-rule strategy. These claims shed light on the complex dynamics at play in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and raise questions about the true intentions of Israeli leadership. The revelations highlight the intricate geopolitical maneuvering and power struggles that have perpetuated the conflict for decades.
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
THE FOREVER WAR Netanyahu deliberately boosted Hamas – by paying “protection money” – to try to ensure there would never be a Palestinian state, says ex PM Barak. And a former intel chief says Israel agreed that Hamas be paid $US 1.4 Billion as part of a divide-and-rule strategy https://t.co/1FEBMvjjk9
— John Lyons (@TheLyonsDen) March 14, 2024
Related Story.
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
In a recent revelation, former Israeli Prime Minister Barak has shed light on a controversial strategy employed by Netanyahu to boost Hamas by paying them “protection money.” This move was allegedly made in an attempt to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, as reported by John Lyons on Twitter.
According to Barak, Netanyahu’s administration deliberately supported Hamas by providing financial aid, ultimately strengthening the group’s influence in the region. This shocking claim has raised concerns about the long-standing conflict between Israel and Palestine, and the impact of such actions on the prospects for peace in the Middle East.
Furthermore, a former intelligence chief has stated that Israel agreed to pay Hamas a substantial sum of $US 1.4 billion as part of a divide-and-rule strategy. This revelation has sparked debate among political analysts and experts on the implications of funding a known terrorist organization for political gain.
The decision to support Hamas, a group recognized for its militant activities and hostility towards Israel, has raised questions about the ethical considerations of such actions. Critics argue that by financing Hamas, Israel may have inadvertently fueled violence and instability in the region, undermining efforts for a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
The use of “protection money” to bolster Hamas has been condemned by many as a short-sighted and dangerous strategy. By empowering a group known for its extremist ideology and violent tactics, Israel may have inadvertently jeopardized the security and stability of the region, risking further escalation of the conflict.
The revelation of Netanyahu’s alleged support for Hamas has sparked outrage among Palestinians and Israelis alike. Many view this revelation as a betrayal of the peace process and a significant obstacle to achieving a lasting solution to the conflict. The use of financial aid to manipulate political outcomes has raised concerns about the integrity of Israeli leadership and their commitment to resolving the longstanding dispute with Palestine.
As the details of this controversial strategy continue to emerge, it is essential for policymakers and world leaders to address the implications of supporting extremist groups for political gain. The use of “protection money” to advance a political agenda undermines the principles of democracy and peace, posing a significant threat to regional stability and security.
In conclusion, the revelation of Netanyahu’s alleged support for Hamas through the payment of “protection money” has sparked widespread debate and condemnation. The decision to fund a known terrorist organization for political gain raises serious ethical concerns and undermines efforts for peace in the Middle East. It is crucial for the international community to address these revelations and hold accountable those responsible for perpetuating conflict and instability in the region.
