Supreme Court: Electoral Bonds Scheme Violates Voters’ Fundamental Rights, Ruling Unanimously

1. “Supreme Court verdict on Electoral Bonds scheme violating voter rights”
2. “CJI bench highlights quid pro quo potential and anonymity clause breach in Electoral Bonds scheme”.

**Supreme Court Unanimously Rules Electoral Bonds Scheme Violates Voter Rights**

The Supreme Court has delivered a groundbreaking unanimous verdict, declaring that the Electoral Bonds scheme violates the fundamental rights of voters. In a landmark decision, the court ruled that the scheme, which allows for anonymous political donations, infringes upon the right to information under Article 19 of the Constitution.

**An Attack on Voter Rights**

The Chief Justice of India (CJI) led bench highlighted the potential for quid pro quo in the Electoral Bonds scheme. The court emphasized that the anonymity clause within the scheme breaches the rights of voters, as it shields the identity of political donors. This lack of transparency goes against the principles of democracy, as voters have the right to know who is financially supporting their chosen candidates.

**A Blow to the Electoral Bonds Scheme**

The verdict of the Supreme Court serves as a significant setback for the government, which introduced the Electoral Bonds scheme in 2018. The scheme was touted as a means to promote transparency in political funding, but critics argued that it provided a loophole for anonymous and unaccounted donations. With the court ruling against the scheme, it is likely that the government will have to revisit its approach to political financing.

**Implications for Democracy**

The court’s decision has far-reaching implications for the Indian democracy. By striking down the Electoral Bonds scheme, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the importance of transparency and accountability in the electoral process. Voters deserve to be fully informed about the financial backing of political parties and candidates, as this information can greatly influence their voting decisions.

**A Victory for Civil Rights**

The unanimous nature of the Supreme Court’s ruling sends a strong message about the significance of protecting voter rights. It demonstrates that the judiciary is committed to upholding the principles of democracy and ensuring that citizens’ voices are not compromised by hidden agendas. This verdict serves as a reminder that the fundamental rights of the people should always be safeguarded, even in the face of seemingly well-intentioned policies.

**Next Steps for Political Funding**

With the Electoral Bonds scheme now deemed unconstitutional, the government will need to explore alternative methods of political funding that prioritize transparency and accountability. The Supreme Court’s decision opens the door for discussions on campaign finance reform, with the aim of creating a more level playing field for all political parties.

**Conclusion**

In a significant development, the Supreme Court has ruled that the Electoral Bonds scheme violates voters’ fundamental rights. The court’s decision highlights the potential for quid pro quo and emphasizes the importance of transparency in political funding. This verdict is a victory for democracy and serves as a reminder that the rights of citizens must always be protected. With the Electoral Bonds scheme struck down, the government will need to reassess its approach to political financing and work towards a more accountable and transparent system..

🚨 #BREAKING

Supreme Court delivers massive unanimous verdict, ruling:

"Electoral Bonds scheme violates voters fundamental rights, including right to information under Article 19"

CJI bench highlights potential for quid pro quo, asserts anonymity clause breaches voter rights… pic.twitter.com/9fPSdbeCJC

— Nabila Jamal (@nabilajamal_) February 15, 2024

Source

@nabilajamal_ said #BREAKING Supreme Court delivers massive unanimous verdict, ruling: "Electoral Bonds scheme violates voters fundamental rights, including right to information under Article 19" CJI bench highlights potential for quid pro quo, asserts anonymity clause breaches voter rights…

RELATED STORY.

– Supreme Court ruling on Electoral Bonds scheme violating voters’ fundamental rights
– CJI bench emphasizing quid pro quo potential and breach of voter rights in Electoral Bonds scheme.