Accident – Death – Obituary News :

Former President Donald Trump Raises Stakes in Battle Against Criminal Charges

Former President Donald Trump has recently escalated his rhetoric, vowing to prosecute President Joe Biden if he wins the November election and the two trade places. However, Trump took it a step further on Tuesday, suggesting that if the criminal charges against him are not dropped, it could set a precedent for the prosecution of current and future ex-presidents.

In a court hearing where a panel of federal judges expressed skepticism towards Trump’s claims of presidential immunity from prosecution, he stated, “I feel that as a president, you have to have immunity, very simple. It’s the opening of a Pandora’s box, and it’s a very, very sad thing that’s happened with this whole situation.”

Trump even hinted that other former presidents might be targeted. He mentioned the possibility of prosecuting former President Barack Obama for drone strikes in the Middle East that resulted in the deaths of U.S. citizens, as well as former President George W. Bush for providing false information that led to the Iraq War.

These arguments, related to the federal charges Trump faces for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results, have raised constitutional issues that may only be resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court. This marks the first time a former president faces criminal prosecutions, intensifying Trump’s campaign to portray the charges as politically motivated attacks from Biden.

While legal experts remain skeptical about the likelihood of endless prosecutions of ex-presidents, Trump has increasingly framed his bid to return to office as seeking “revenge” against his political enemies who he believes have wronged him.

Seeking maximum attention for his legal battle against the federal government and his primary campaign, Trump made a point of physically attending Tuesday’s court hearing. This move allowed him to emphasize his determination to retaliate against what he portrayed as Democratic vindictiveness if he were to win the election.

“That will be bedlam in the country if the prosecution continues,” Trump warned.

Trump’s lawyers argued against a future filled with perpetual payback for presidents leaving office. Will Scharf, one of Trump’s attorneys, emphasized, “The president is exactly right that if this prosecution is allowed to stand, no presidency in the future will ever be safe.”

However, legal experts find these arguments troubling. Claire Finkelstein, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania, commented, “You would think that somebody running for the presidency would not be trying to claim that they’re immune to the criminal process but would be reassuring voters that he’s following the law.”

Trump’s main argument is that his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results were simply part of his official duty as president. He accuses Biden’s Department of Justice of political persecution and undermining democratic traditions.

The recent hearing followed Trump’s appeal against a lower court ruling that denied him presidential immunity from charges of conspiring to defraud the United States by fighting his election defeat.

Trump has become fixated on the analogy of Pandora’s box, referencing the divine container from ancient Greek myth that, when opened, released disease, despair, and other miseries into the world.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote, “If I don’t get Immunity, then Crooked Joe Biden doesn’t get Immunity, and with the Border Invasion and Afghanistan Surrender, alone, not to mention the Millions of dollars that went into his ‘pockets’ with money from foreign countries, Joe would be ripe for Indictment. By weaponizing the DOJ against his Political Opponent, ME, Joe has opened a giant Pandora’s Box.”

During the court hearing, Trump’s lawyer reiterated the Pandora’s box analogy, with his allies supporting the sentiment, even if they didn’t use the same reference.

Mike Davis, the former chief counsel for nominations for the Senate Judiciary Committee and founder of The Article III Project, which advocates for conservative judges and rulings, stated, “If these judges cannot set aside their Trump derangement and do not establish at a baseline level that presidents are immune from criminal prosecution, it’s going to be very detrimental to the presidency.”

Davis further argued that Obama could face murder charges for the drone strikes on Anwar Al-Awklaki and his 16-year-old son, Abdulraham, in 2011. However, Paul Coggins, a former U.S. attorney in Texas, disagreed, stating that there is already well-established precedent for federal officials, including the president, being immune from prosecution for decisions made in good faith while engaged in official business.

While Trump’s concerns about potential prosecutions of ex-presidents in the future may hold some merit, legal experts believe that the immunity question has already been settled. The courts have consistently ruled that presidents are not immune from criminal prosecutions under certain circumstances.

Previous presidents, such as Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, have faced legal jeopardy for actions taken while in office. Nixon received a pardon from his successor, Gerald Ford, indicating potential criminal liability in the Watergate scandal. Clinton reached a deal with a special counsel investigating his relationship with a White House intern, sparing him from prosecution but requiring an admission of lying under oath.

In conclusion, Trump’s battle against criminal charges has intensified, with his claims of presidential immunity raising constitutional concerns. While legal experts dismiss the likelihood of endless prosecutions of ex-presidents, Trump continues to frame his campaign as seeking revenge against his political enemies. The outcome of this legal battle may ultimately be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court.

.