Supreme Court Sets Aside Remission of 11 Convicts in Bilkis Bano Case; Orders Surrender to Prison

**Supreme Court Sets Aside Remission of 11 Convicts in Bilkis Bano Case; Orders Surrender to Prison**

The Supreme Court has made a significant decision in the case of Bilkis Bano, setting aside the remission of 11 convicts and ordering them to surrender in prison. The ruling was announced on January 8, 2024, causing a stir in legal circles and among the public.

Bilkis Bano, a survivor of the horrific Gujarat riots in 2002, has been fighting for justice for over two decades. The case gained international attention due to its brutality and the failure of the initial investigation. Bano, who was pregnant at the time, witnessed the murder of 14 family members and endured a brutal sexual assault.

The Supreme Court’s decision to set aside the remission of the 11 convicts comes as a major blow to their hopes of early release. These convicts were originally sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court in 2008. However, the State Government granted remission to the convicts in 2019, reducing their sentences.

The top court’s order to surrender in prison means that the convicts will have to serve the remainder of their original life sentences. The decision has been hailed by many as a step towards justice for Bilkis Bano and a deterrent for future perpetrators of such heinous crimes.

Legal experts have opined that the Supreme Court’s ruling is significant in terms of upholding the principles of justice and deterring the misuse of remission powers by state governments. The court’s intervention in this case highlights the need to ensure that justice is not compromised, especially in cases of grave human rights violations.

The Bilkis Bano case has served as a landmark in the struggle for justice and accountability. It has brought attention to the plight of survivors of communal violence and the challenges they face in seeking justice. The Supreme Court’s decision to set aside the remission and order surrender sends a strong message that crimes of this nature will not go unpunished.

The ruling has also sparked a debate on the role of state governments in granting remission to convicts. While the power to grant remission is within the purview of the executive, it should be exercised judiciously, keeping in mind the gravity of the offense and the rights of the victims. The Supreme Court’s intervention in this case underscores the need for a balanced approach in granting remission.

The decision has been widely welcomed by human rights organizations and activists who have been advocating for justice for Bilkis Bano. It is hoped that the ruling will set a precedent for future cases involving similar crimes and serve as a deterrent against the violation of human rights.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision to set aside the remission of 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano case and order their surrender in prison is a significant step in the pursuit of justice. The ruling reaffirms the importance of upholding justice and deterring crimes of such nature. It is a milestone in the long journey towards justice for Bilkis Bano and other survivors of communal violence..

BREAKING | #SupremeCourt Set Aside Remission Of 11 Convicts In Bilkis Bano Case; Asks Them To Surrender In Prisonhttps://t.co/dpMT7pFZhL

— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) January 8, 2024

Source

@LiveLawIndia said BREAKING | #SupremeCourt Set Aside Remission Of 11 Convicts In Bilkis Bano Case; Asks Them To Surrender In Prison livelaw.in/top-stories/su…

RELATED STORY.