Special Counsel Jack Smith Files Motion to Hide Left’s J6 Fedsurrection Planning from Public

Title: Special Counsel Jack Smith Files Motion to Exclude Evidence of Federal Preparation and Response to January 6th Incident

Introduction (50 words):
Special Counsel Jack Smith has recently filed a motion to prevent any evidence related to the federal government’s preparation and response to the January 6th incident from being admitted. This move has raised concerns about transparency and accountability, as it may hinder the public’s understanding of the events that took place on that day.

Body:

In a surprising development, Special Counsel Jack Smith has taken steps to keep evidence regarding the federal government’s preparation and response to the January 6th incident out of the public eye. This decision has raised eyebrows and sparked a debate about transparency and accountability.

The motion filed by Smith aims to exclude any evidence related to the federal government’s actions leading up to and during the incident. This includes information about the planning and response of law enforcement agencies and other federal entities involved.

Critics argue that this motion could hinder the public’s understanding of what transpired on January 6th. The incident, which saw a violent mob storming the U.S. Capitol, resulted in multiple injuries, deaths, and significant damage to the historic building. The public has a right to know the extent of the federal government’s involvement and response to such a significant event.

Supporters of the motion claim that it is necessary to protect sensitive information and ongoing investigations. They argue that disclosing this evidence could compromise national security or impede the ongoing legal proceedings related to the incident.

However, many believe that transparency and accountability are crucial in a democratic society. The events of January 6th shook the nation and revealed vulnerabilities in the security apparatus. The public deserves to know what steps were taken to prevent such an incident and how the response unfolded.

The decision to exclude evidence related to federal preparation and response is particularly concerning given the ongoing investigations into the incident. The House Select Committee on the January 6th Attack is currently conducting its own inquiry, and access to this evidence could be vital in understanding the full scope of the events.

It is important to note that this motion does not necessarily mean that the evidence will be permanently excluded. The decision ultimately lies with the courts, and they will have to carefully consider the arguments put forth by both sides.

Conclusion (50 words):
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s motion to exclude evidence regarding federal preparation and response to the January 6th incident has raised questions about transparency and accountability. The public’s right to know the full extent of the government’s actions on that day should be carefully considered by the courts in the interest of justice and democracy..

BREAKING: In A Blatant Effort To Keep The J6 Fedsurrection Planning By The Left From Being Exposed To The Public… Special Counsel Jack Smith Has Filed A Motion To NOT ALLOW ANY EVIDENCE BE ADMITTED REGARDING FEDS PREPARATION & RESPONSE OF JAN 6TH! pic.twitter.com/vWjVzSPYzV

— John Basham (@JohnBasham) December 27, 2023

Source

@JohnBasham said BREAKING: In A Blatant Effort To Keep The J6 Fedsurrection Planning By The Left From Being Exposed To The Public… Special Counsel Jack Smith Has Filed A Motion To NOT ALLOW ANY EVIDENCE BE ADMITTED REGARDING FEDS PREPARATION & RESPONSE OF JAN 6TH!

RELATED STORY.