Judge Allows Naming of Teenagers Convicted for the Murder of Brianna Ghey

Following their conviction, a judge has announced that the media will have the authority to publicly identify the two teenagers responsible for the brutal murder of Brianna Ghey upon their sentencing.

Throughout the trial, the schoolchildren, who fatally stabbed 16-year-old Brianna 28 times in Culcheth Linear Park near Warrington, have been known as Girl X and Boy Y, as they were granted anonymity.

This legal order was put in place when the defendants were charged with murder in February 2022, and due to their young age, it has remained in effect until now, making it illegal to disclose their identities.

But why was this order implemented, and why will it only be lifted on 2 February 2024?

Understanding the Legal Order

The legal order enforced in this case is based on Section 45 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, which came into effect in April 2015. This act allows a criminal court to prohibit the publication of any information that would reveal the identity of a young person accused of a crime until they reach the age of 18.

Such identifying details include their name, address, school affiliation, or even a photograph of the accused.

Failure to comply with these reporting restrictions would constitute a criminal offense and contempt of court.

Reasons Behind the Order

The judge imposed the anonymity order during the teenagers’ initial appearance at Liverpool Crown Court, before the case was transferred to Manchester for further proceedings.

Such measures are in place to safeguard defendants from having their reputation permanently tarnished, especially if they are ultimately found not guilty.

Had either or both of the teenagers been acquitted, their anonymity would have remained protected by law.

An example of the importance of these restrictions can be seen in a previous murder trial in 2015, which was aborted due to numerous social media posts identifying the two teenage defendants. This resulted in significant financial costs and delayed justice for the victim’s family.

Judge’s Statement in Brianna’s Trial

Mrs. Justice Yip, who presided over the trial of Girl X and Boy Y, ruled that the teenagers could only be named after their sentencing, set to take place on 2 February 2024.

If the reporting restrictions had not been lifted, the media would have had to wait until both teenagers turned 18 before legally disclosing their identities.

Why the Delay Until 2 February 2024?

Although Mrs. Justice Yip lifted the anonymity order, she imposed a stay until the defendants are sentenced on 2 February, at which point the media can publicly name them. Both individuals are facing a mandatory life sentence for their involvement in Brianna’s murder.

Mrs. Justice Yip stated, “There is a strong public interest in the full and unrestricted reporting of what is plainly an exceptional case.”

She added, “The public will naturally wish to know the identities of the young people responsible as they seek to understand how children could do something so dreadful.”

The judge also emphasized that it was “inevitable” for their identities to be revealed eventually, as the order protecting their anonymity would have expired in 2025, when they turned 18.

“Continuing the reporting restrictions until the defendants turn 18 would, in my view, represent a substantial and unreasonable restriction on the freedom of the press,” she concluded.

Precedents of Anonymity Orders

Similar anonymity orders have been implemented in other high-profile cases involving underage killers.

For instance, the young murderers of James Bulger, Jon Venables, and Robert Thompson were initially referred to as Child A and Child B. However, after their conviction, the judge allowed their names to be disclosed, stating that the public interest outweighed the defendants’ interests.

However, due to the threat of vigilante action, both Venables and Thompson were provided with new identities to protect their lives.

In 2001, a High Court injunction was issued to prevent the media from publishing their new identities, granting them lifelong anonymity. This order not only safeguards Venables and Thompson but also innocent individuals who have been mistakenly identified as either of them.

In 2019, a woman received an eight-month prison sentence and was ordered to pay £10,000 after she published information and photographs of Jon Venables online.

---

Stay Informed with Our Latest Podcasts