This is Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine—a man tasked w/ impartially upholding the law—bragging about breaking the law to harass women at abortion clinics.

Justice John Devine, a member of the Texas Supreme Court, is facing criticism after a recent tweet in which he appeared to boast about breaking the law to harass women at abortion clinics. The tweet, posted by Beto O’Rourke on December 11, 2023, included a video of Devine and a statement about his blocking of Kate Cox from obtaining a legal abortion. Devine is up for re-election in 2024.

The tweet has sparked outrage and raised questions about the impartiality of the Texas Supreme Court. Devine’s role as a justice is to uphold the law and make impartial decisions, but his apparent admission of breaking the law to harass women at abortion clinics has raised concerns about his ability to fulfill this duty.

Abortion rights activists argue that Devine’s actions are not only unethical but also a violation of women’s rights. They argue that women have a legal right to obtain an abortion and that any attempts to obstruct or harass them in exercising this right are unacceptable.

Devine’s tweet has also ignited a debate about the role of personal beliefs and biases in judicial decision-making. Critics argue that Devine’s personal beliefs on abortion should not influence his decisions as a justice. They argue that justices should base their decisions on the law and the Constitution, rather than personal beliefs or political agendas.

Supporters of Devine argue that he has the right to express his personal beliefs and opinions, even if they differ from the mainstream. They argue that judges are not required to be completely impartial and that their personal beliefs can shape their decision-making in a way that is consistent with the law.

However, many legal experts argue that judges should strive to be impartial and base their decisions solely on the law. They argue that the judiciary plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and that impartiality is essential to maintain public trust and confidence in the legal system.

The controversy surrounding Devine’s tweet has raised questions about the accountability of judges. Critics argue that judges should be held to a higher standard of conduct and that their actions should be subject to scrutiny and consequences.

The Texas Supreme Court has not yet issued a statement regarding Devine’s tweet. It remains to be seen how this controversy will impact Devine’s re-election campaign in 2024.

Overall, the tweet by Justice John Devine has sparked a heated debate about the role of personal beliefs in judicial decision-making and the accountability of judges. The controversy surrounding Devine’s actions has highlighted the importance of impartiality and integrity in the judiciary, and it remains to be seen how this controversy will be resolved.

.

This is Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine—a man tasked w/ impartially upholding the law—bragging about breaking the law to harass women at abortion clinics.

He’s one of the justices who just blocked Kate Cox from getting a *legal* abortion.

He’s up for reelection in 2024. pic.twitter.com/PoOsqIw82Q

— Beto O’Rourke (@BetoORourke) December 11, 2023

Source

@BetoORourke said This is Texas Supreme Court Justice John Devine—a man tasked w/ impartially upholding the law—bragging about breaking the law to harass women at abortion clinics. He’s one of the justices who just blocked Kate Cox from getting a *legal* abortion. He’s up for reelection in 2024.

RELATED STORY.