Jacob Rees-Mogg questions if Prince Harry meets security criteria, former royal protection head disagrees.

Former Head of Royal Protection at Scotland Yard, Dai Davies, has stated that Prince Harry should not receive taxpayer-funded police security in the UK. Jacob Rees-Mogg questioned whether the criteria had been met for Prince Harry to have police security.

Jacob Rees-Mogg: ‘Has the criteria been met for Prince Harry to have police security?’

Dai Davies: ‘The simple answer is no.’

Former Head of Royal Protection at Scotland Yard, Dai Davies, says Prince Harry should not receive taxpayer funded police security in the UK. pic.twitter.com/pUCIhzNC7y

— GB News (@GBNEWS) December 5, 2023

The debate over whether Prince Harry should receive taxpayer-funded police security in the UK has sparked controversy and divided opinions. Former Head of Royal Protection at Scotland Yard, Dai Davies, firmly believes that the criteria has not been met for Prince Harry to be entitled to police security.

In a recent interview with Jacob Rees-Mogg on GB News, Davies stated that the simple answer is no. He argued that since Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle have stepped down as senior members of the royal family and have relocated to the United States, they no longer fulfill the criteria for police security in the UK.

Davies emphasized that the primary responsibility of the police is to protect the public, and it would be inappropriate to allocate taxpayer funds to protect an individual who is no longer actively engaged in public duties within the country. He suggested that Prince Harry and Meghan should hire their own private security team, as many other high-profile individuals do.

This viewpoint has ignited a wider conversation about the role of the royal family and their entitlement to public funds. Some argue that as a member of the royal family, Prince Harry should always be entitled to police protection, regardless of his current status. Others contend that since he has chosen to step back from his royal duties, it is only fair that he assumes the responsibility for his own security expenses.

The issue of taxpayer-funded police security for Prince Harry has become a contentious topic, with valid arguments on both sides. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how this will ultimately be resolved and what implications it may have for the future of the royal family..

Source

@GBNEWS said Jacob Rees-Mogg: 'Has the criteria been met for Prince Harry to have police security?' Dai Davies: 'The simple answer is no.' Former Head of Royal Protection at Scotland Yard, Dai Davies, says Prince Harry should not receive taxpayer funded police security in the UK.

RELATED STORY.