Dana Perino: Kissinger critics’ opinions don’t matter since he outlived them

Fox News host Dana Perino has faced criticism for suggesting that the opinions of deceased critics of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger do not matter. Perino argued that since Kissinger outlived his critics, their opinions are irrelevant. Critics argue that this does not absolve Kissinger of any wrongdoing.

Dana Perino seems to make the argument that since some of Henry Kissinger’s critics have died their opinions about him don’t matter. Henry Kissinger outlived them so it’s settled. “He outlived his critics” is not exactly absolving him of anything. pic.twitter.com/jNtvbYvvnp

— Decoding Fox News (@DecodingFoxNews) December 2, 2023

In a recent Twitter post, Dana Perino, a prominent American political commentator, made an argument about the late Henry Kissinger and his critics. Perino suggested that since some of Kissinger’s critics have passed away, their opinions about him no longer hold any weight. However, simply outliving one’s critics does not absolve anyone of their actions or erase the criticisms leveled against them.

Henry Kissinger, a former United States Secretary of State and National Security Advisor, is a highly controversial figure in American politics. While some praise him for his diplomatic efforts and contributions to international relations, others condemn him for his involvement in covert operations and alleged war crimes during his tenure.

Perino’s argument, as presented in the Twitter post, seems flawed. The passing of Kissinger’s critics does not diminish the validity of their concerns or negate the impact of his actions. It is essential to remember that the opinions and criticisms of individuals, whether alive or deceased, contribute to our understanding of historical events and the people involved.

The role of critics is crucial in holding individuals accountable for their actions, and it is through critical analysis and debate that societies progress and learn from past mistakes. Dismissing the opinions of deceased critics undermines the importance of a collective understanding of history and the need for ongoing evaluation.

In conclusion, Dana Perino’s argument that Henry Kissinger’s critics no longer matter due to their passing is flawed. The passing of individuals does not invalidate their opinions or absolve anyone of their actions. It is essential to engage in critical analysis and maintain a nuanced understanding of historical figures, their contributions, and the criticisms they face..

Source

@DecodingFoxNews said Dana Perino seems to make the argument that since some of Henry Kissinger's critics have died their opinions about him don't matter. Henry Kissinger outlived them so it's settled. "He outlived his critics" is not exactly absolving him of anything.

RELATED STORY.