Absurd Allegations: The Dubious Case of the Purported Gurpatwant Singh Pannun Murder Plot

Accident – Death – Obituary News : In January 1985, the government of Taiwan made a shocking admission that it was involved in the murder of Chinese-American citizen Henry Liu on American soil. This marked a targeted killing of a Chinese-American citizen by an allied nation. Liu, a 52-year-old writer, had written several critical articles and books about the Nationalist Party that ruled Taiwan. This admission came three years after Taiwan’s denial of involvement in another plot where Chinese-American professor Chen Wen-chen, a vocal critic of the Taiwanese government, was found dead at National Taiwan University. Taiwan had claimed that Chen had committed suicide.

This admission raises questions about the morality of international relations and the idea that nations are judged and ranked based on their “good behavior”. It emphasizes that there are no points for being “nice” in international relations, but there are penalties for being weak. This case serves as a reminder that friendship, alliance, or partnership between nations are driven by self-interest rather than moral considerations.

Drawing a parallel to the purported Gurpatwant Singh Pannun case, where American federal prosecutors have accused an Indian government official of orchestrating a plot to harm Pannun, an alleged designated terrorist, on American soil, the article questions the notion of reputational damage to India. It highlights that there is no proof of India’s involvement, and India has denied any connection to the case. The article dismisses the idea that international relations should be judged based on reputation and emphasizes the importance of a nation’s self-interest.

The article goes on to analyze the accusations made by US federal prosecutors and raises doubts about their credibility. It questions the competence of Indian intelligence agencies, suggesting that it is unlikely for seasoned officers to hatch incriminating plots over messaging apps and take chances with sophisticated American intelligence agencies. The article likens the case to a bad Hollywood plot and claims that it asks the audience to suspend disbelief.

The US justice department claims to have thwarted an elaborate plot to kill a Sikh separatist leader and has charged an Indian national named Nikhil Gupta for conspiring with an unnamed Indian government employee. The article points out that the indictment fails to mention Pannun’s terrorist antecedents and portrays him as the victim of a foiled plot. It questions the strength of the American case, which relies heavily on Gupta, a notorious international narcotics and weapons trafficker, and involves multiple US government agents.

The article suggests that the case raises doubts about the competence of Indian intelligence agencies and may reflect poorly on US-India ties. It draws attention to the track record of American intelligence agencies in laying fake plots and conducting sting operations for bogus arrests. It cites examples of FBI involvement in similar cases and questions the credibility of the evidence presented.

In conclusion, this article highlights the admission by Taiwan of its involvement in the murder of a Chinese-American citizen on American soil and draws parallels to the Gurpatwant Singh Pannun case. It questions the morality of international relations and emphasizes the importance of a nation’s self-interest. It raises doubts about the credibility of the accusations made by US federal prosecutors and suggests that the case may reflect poorly on US-India ties..