Supreme Court to Hear Delhi Govt’s Plea Against Appointment/Extension of Chief Secretary by LG/MHA

By | November 28, 2023

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

The Supreme Court will hear the Delhi government’s plea challenging the appointment/extension of the Delhi Chief Secretary by the LG/MHA without consultation from the Delhi government. In the previous hearing, the court had asked the LG/MHA to provide a panel of names to the Delhi government for the selection of a new Chief Secretary.

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

RELATED STORY.

The Supreme Court of India is set to hear a plea filed by the Delhi government challenging the appointment/extension of the Delhi Chief Secretary by the Lieutenant Governor (LG) and the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) without the consultation of the Delhi government. This plea comes as a result of a long-standing power struggle between the Delhi government and the LG/MHA.

In the previous hearing, the Supreme Court had directed the LG and the MHA to provide a panel of names to the Delhi government from which a new Chief Secretary (CS) can be appointed. This move was seen as an attempt to address the concerns raised by the Delhi government over the lack of consultation in the appointment process.

The appointment of the Chief Secretary is a crucial decision as the CS is responsible for the administration and governance of the state. The Delhi government argues that since it is the elected representative of the people, it should have a say in the appointment of the CS. However, the LG and the MHA contend that the power to appoint the CS lies with them, as per the constitutional provisions and the interpretation of the GNCTD Act.

This case holds significant importance as it deals with the issue of power distribution between the elected government and the LG/MHA. The Delhi government argues that the LG/MHA’s interference in the appointment process undermines the democratic principles and the federal structure of the country. On the other hand, the LG/MHA argue that their role is to ensure the smooth functioning of the administration and to protect the interests of the Union government.

The power struggle between the elected government and the LG/MHA has been a recurring issue in Delhi. Ever since the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) came to power in Delhi, there have been several instances of clashes between the Delhi government and the LG/MHA over various issues, including the appointment of bureaucrats, control over the police force, and control over land.

The Supreme Court’s decision in this case will have far-reaching implications for the power dynamics between the elected government and the LG/MHA not only in Delhi but also in other Union Territories. It will set a precedent for future disputes and establish the extent of the elected government’s authority in the appointment process.

The case has garnered significant attention and debate from legal experts, politicians, and citizens alike. Many believe that a balance needs to be struck between the powers of the elected government and the LG/MHA to ensure effective governance and the protection of democratic principles.

As the case progresses, it remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will interpret the constitutional provisions and the GNCTD Act. The decision will have a lasting impact on the relationship between the elected government and the LG/MHA, and it will shape the future of governance in Delhi..

Source

@DaaruBaazMehta said JUST IN Supreme Court will today hear Delhi Govts plea challenging the appointment/extension of Delhi Chief Secretary by LG/MHA without Delhi Govt's consultation. Supreme Court in last hearing had asked LG/MHA to provide a panel of names to Delhi Govt from which a new CS can be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…