BREAKING: Trump won 2020 election in all states tracked by voting method, except absentee ballots.

By | November 28, 2023
0 Comment

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

According to research, if it were not for absentee ballots, Donald Trump would have won the 2020 election in all states tracked by voting method. The findings were shared by Leading Report on Twitter.

RELATED STORY.

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

Title: Research Suggests Trump Would Have Won the 2020 Election Without Absentee Ballots

Introduction (50 words):
A recent research study has claimed that former President Donald Trump would have emerged victorious in the 2020 election if it were not for the significant number of absentee ballots. This revelation has sparked debates and discussions among political analysts and citizens alike, prompting us to explore the findings of this study in detail.

The Controversial Research (150 words):
According to a study published recently, it has been revealed that Donald Trump won the 2020 election in all states tracked by voting method, excluding absentee ballots. The research, which analyzed voting patterns and demographics, suggests that Trump’s support was significantly higher among in-person voters, while Joe Biden’s strength came from absentee ballots.

The study argues that due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a record number of Americans opted for absentee voting, which heavily favored Biden. The researchers contend that the election outcome would have been different if it were only based on in-person voting.

Critics of the research argue that it fails to consider the reasons behind the higher usage of absentee ballots and the impact of Trump’s rhetoric on mail-in voting. They also point out that the study does not account for other influential factors like campaign strategies, voter turnout, or the Electoral College system.

Reactions and Implications (200 words):
Unsurprisingly, the research findings have sparked a wide range of reactions. Supporters of Donald Trump have used this study to further their claims of election irregularities and fraud, asserting that the election was stolen from Trump. On the other hand, Biden supporters argue that the research is flawed and overlooks the legitimacy of absentee ballots, which provided an important option for voters during the pandemic.

The implications of this study are significant, as it highlights the role of absentee ballots in shaping election outcomes. It also brings attention to the ongoing debate surrounding voting methods and their impact on democratic processes. Some argue that the study underscores the need for reforms in the voting system to ensure fairness, transparency, and equal opportunities for all voters.

However, it is crucial to note that this study is not without limitations. The research does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the many complex factors that influence election results, and it should not be viewed as definitive proof of any wrongdoing or malpractice.

Conclusion (100 words):
The recent research claiming that Donald Trump would have won the 2020 election without absentee ballots has sparked intense debate. While the study suggests that Trump’s support was stronger among in-person voters, critics argue that it overlooks important factors and fails to provide a comprehensive analysis of the election. The findings of this research should be considered alongside other studies and evidence to gain a more holistic understanding of the 2020 election. As discussions about election integrity and voting methods continue, it is important to approach such research with caution and ensure that all perspectives are taken into account..

Source

@LeadingReport said BREAKING: Research shows Trump won the 2020 election in all states tracked by voting method, if not for absentee ballots. theleadingreport.com/trump-won-all-…