BREAKING: Government monitored critics’ social media, compiled secret files to block public speaking.

By | November 27, 2023

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

Fifteen government departments have reportedly been monitoring the social media activity of potential critics and creating “secret files” to prevent them from speaking at public events, according to a report by The Observer. The revelation raises concerns about freedom of speech and government surveillance.

RELATED STORY.

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

Title: Government Departments Monitoring Social Media Activity to Silence Critics

Introduction

In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that fifteen government departments have been secretly monitoring the social media activity of potential critics. These departments have been compiling “secret files” to block these individuals from speaking at public events. This revelation raises serious concerns about the government’s commitment to freedom of speech and the right to express dissenting views.

The Scope of the Surveillance

According to a report published in The Observer, government departments have been actively monitoring social media platforms to gather information about individuals who criticize government policies or express dissenting opinions. The report highlights the extent of this surveillance, indicating that fifteen departments are involved in this monitoring process.

Targeting Potential Critics

The government’s practice of monitoring social media activity seems to primarily target individuals who are potential critics. By compiling “secret files” on these individuals, the government aims to prevent them from speaking at public events, effectively silencing their voices. This raises concerns about the government’s commitment to transparency and the ability of citizens to hold their elected officials accountable.

The Threat to Freedom of Speech

Freedom of speech is a fundamental pillar of any democratic society. It allows citizens to voice their opinions, express dissent, and engage in meaningful debate. The revelation of government departments monitoring social media activity to suppress critics undermines this essential democratic principle. Such actions not only infringe upon individual rights but also erode public trust in the government’s willingness to uphold democratic values.

The Chilling Effect

The practice of monitoring social media activity and compiling secret files is likely to have a chilling effect on free speech. Knowing that their online activity is being closely monitored, individuals may feel hesitant to express their opinions openly for fear of reprisals. This self-censorship stifles the free exchange of ideas and undermines the diversity of thought that is essential for a thriving democracy.

A Threat to Accountability

The monitoring of potential critics and the subsequent blocking of their participation in public events raises concerns about accountability within the government. By silencing dissenting voices, the government limits the opportunity for critical dialogue and constructive criticism. It becomes increasingly difficult for citizens to hold government officials accountable for their actions, decisions, and policies.

Conclusion

The revelation that fifteen government departments have been monitoring social media activity to compile “secret files” and silence potential critics is deeply concerning. This practice not only undermines the principles of freedom of speech but also threatens the accountability and transparency that are essential for a healthy democracy. It is crucial for citizens, civil society organizations, and the media to demand answers from the government and push for safeguards to protect the rights of individuals to express their views without fear of retribution..

Source

@MarkChangizi said BREAKING “Fifteen government departments have been monitoring the social media activity of potential critics and compiling “secret files” in order to block them from speaking at public events, the Observer can reveal.” theguardian.com/politics/2023/… h/t @PeterJFilipovic