BREAKING: Americans sue gov’t over COVID vaccine injuries, call compensation program “unconstitutional kangaroo court”

By | November 23, 2023

SEE AMAZON.COM DEALS FOR TODAY

SHOP NOW

Americans who have been injured by COVID vaccines are suing the federal government, alleging that the compensation program they are required to go through is an unconstitutional “kangaroo court” that unfairly denies most claims.

Title: Americans Injured by COVID Vaccines Challenge Federal Compensation Program

Introduction

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

In a recent development, Americans who have suffered adverse effects from COVID-19 vaccines are taking legal action against the federal government. They argue that the compensation program they are required to pursue is an unconstitutional “kangaroo court” that unjustly rejects the majority of claims. This article delves into the challenges faced by these individuals and the implications of their lawsuit.

The Controversial Compensation Program

The compensation program in question is the federal system established to provide financial assistance to individuals who experience severe side effects from vaccines. Designed to protect vaccine manufacturers from liability, this program is administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Court of Federal Claims.

The Allegations

Those filing the lawsuit claim that the compensation program is fundamentally flawed. They argue that it operates as a “kangaroo court” wherein the majority of claims are unjustly rejected. These individuals contend that the system is stacked against them, making it nearly impossible to receive fair compensation for the injuries they have suffered.

Concerns Over Unconstitutionality

The plaintiffs argue that the compensation program violates their constitutional rights. They claim that being forced to pursue compensation through this program is tantamount to denying them access to a fair and impartial court. By designating the Court of Federal Claims as the sole venue for litigating vaccine injury claims, they believe their right to due process is being undermined.

The Burden of Proof

One of the main issues raised by the plaintiffs is the high burden of proof required to establish a vaccine injury claim. Under the current system, individuals must prove that their injury is directly caused by the vaccine. This requirement places an immense burden on claimants, making it extremely difficult to prove causation and secure compensation.

Inadequate Compensation

Another concern highlighted in the lawsuit is the inadequacy of the compensation awarded to successful claimants. Critics argue that the program fails to adequately compensate individuals for the physical, emotional, and financial toll caused by vaccine injuries. They contend that victims deserve fair and just compensation to help them cope with the lifelong consequences of their injuries.

The Implications

The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the compensation program and the broader vaccination landscape. If successful, it may prompt a reevaluation of the current system, with potential changes to the burden of proof and the compensation awarded to victims. This could help ensure a fairer and more compassionate approach to addressing vaccine injuries.

Conclusion

The legal challenge launched by Americans injured by COVID vaccines against the federal government’s compensation program raises significant concerns about the fairness and constitutionality of the current system. As the lawsuit progresses, it will be crucial to closely monitor its impact on the compensation program and the rights of vaccine injury victims. Ultimately, the goal should be to strike a balance between protecting vaccine manufacturers’ interests and ensuring fair and just compensation for those who suffer adverse effects from vaccines..

Source

@LeadingReport said BREAKING: Americans injured by the COVID vaccines are suing the federal government, claiming the federal program they're forced to pursue compensation through is an unconstitutional "kangaroo court" that unjustly rejects almost all claims it receives.

RELATED STORY.