“Famed Forensic Scientist Henry Lee Accused of Fabricating Evidence in Murder Trial”

Forensic scientist Henry Lee has defended his reputation after being found liable in a lawsuit for fabricating evidence in a murder trial. Two innocent men, Ralph “Ricky” Birch and Shawn Henning, were convicted in 1985 based on Lee’s testimony about bloodstains on a towel found at the crime scene. However, tests done after the trial showed the stain was not blood. Lee denied fabricating evidence and stated that the blood traces may have degraded over time. The judge ruled that a jury will determine the amount of damages against Lee, while the case against other defendants will proceed to trial. PAT EATON-ROBB, Associated Press reported

Forensic scientist Henry Lee is defending his work and reputation after a federal judge found him liable in a lawsuit for fabricating evidence in a murder trial that led to the wrongful conviction of two innocent men. Ralph “Ricky” Birch and Shawn Henning were convicted in 1985 based partially on testimony from Lee about bloodstains on a towel found at the crime scene. However, tests done after the trial showed that the stain was not blood.

In a statement, Lee expressed his disappointment with the ruling and denied fabricating evidence. He suggested that the traces of blood may have degraded over the 20 years between the crime and when defense experts tested the towel. Lee emphasized that his testing of the towel did not directly implicate Birch and Henning in the crime and that his scientific testimony at their trial included exculpatory evidence.

Lee is a renowned forensic scientist and former head of the state’s forensic laboratory. He has worked on high-profile cases such as the O.J. Simpson murder trial and the JonBenet Ramsey murder case. However, his work has come under scrutiny in several cases, including accusations of taking evidence from crime scenes.

The judge’s ruling means that a jury will determine the amount of damages against Lee, while the cases against the other defendants will proceed to trial. Lee maintains that he presented his scientific findings truthfully and that it is not his role to determine what evidence to introduce or what questions to ask during a trial.

The wrongful conviction of Birch and Henning highlights the importance of accurate and ethical forensic science in the criminal justice system. It serves as a reminder that forensic experts must conduct their work diligently and impartially to ensure justice is served..

1. forensic scientist Henry Lee
2. fabricating evidence
3. wrongful conviction lawsuit.